Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (No 3)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation2012-1107 FCA A
Date2012
Year2012
CourtFederal Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 cases
  • Qantas Airways Ltd v Transport Workers' Union of Australia
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 4 May 2022
    ...taken because of that circumstance: Bendigo v Barclay at [62]; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1218 at [80] (Jessup J); Shea v TRUenergy Services Pty Ltd (No 6) [2014] FCA 271, (2014) 242 IR 1 at [777]. Nor does the fact that the adverse ......
  • Alam v National Australia Bank Limited
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 8 October 2021
    ...Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd [2014] HCA 41; (2014) 253 CLR 243 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1218 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Endeavour Coal Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 76, (2015) 231 FCR 150 Construction, Forestry, Mining an......
  • Menon, in the matter of an election for offices of the Manufacturing Division of the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 18 October 2021
    ...Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW) (1982) 149 CLR 337 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1218; 228 IR 195 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd [2014] HCA 41; 253 CLR 243 Gordon v Gonda [1955] 1 WLR 885 Investo......
  • Transport Workers' Union of Australia v Qantas Airways Limited (No 4)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 17 December 2021
    ...Precast Concrete Nominees Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 1215 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1218; (2012) 228 IR 195 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Pilbara Iron Company (Services) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 697 Construction,......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
  • CFMEU v BHP Coal - High Court upholds employer's right to terminate employee for breaching its code of conduct
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 30 November 2014
    ...employee and imposes civil penalty on employer In the first instance decision on 7 November 2012, in CFMEU v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1218, Justice Jessup of the Federal Court accepted BHP's reason for terminating Mr Doevendans because his conduct did not conform to company expect......
  • The Scab Sign Incident: CFMEU v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 23 December 2012
    ...Jessup of the Federal Court of Australia gave his judgment in Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1218. The case was a claim under the general protection provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) and concerned whether a CFMEU membe......
  • High Court majority applies Barclay decision to find that the scab-sign dismissal was lawful
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 24 October 2014
    ...and to explore different factual scenarios for successful claims. Footnotes 1See article here. 2CFMEU v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1218 (7 November 3BHP Coal Pty Ltd v CFMEU [2013] FCAFC 132 (13 December 2013). 4[2014] HCA 41, [7]. 5[2014] HCA 41, [8]. 6[2014] HCA 41, [10]. 7[2014] ......