Construction Forestry Mining & Energy Union v Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeCrennan,Kiefel,Bell,Gageler,Keane JJ
Judgment Date14 August 2013
Neutral Citation2013-0814 HCA A,[2013] HCA 36
Docket NumberP26/2013
Date14 August 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
18 cases
  • Mann v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 9 Octubre 2019
    ...... [2019] HCA 32 HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA Kiefel CJ, Bell, Gageler, Keane, ... 346 [2]; [2008] HCA 22 ; Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union v Mammoet Australia Pty ......
  • New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council(Appellant) v Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 Diciembre 2016
    ...Australia (2007) 232 CLR 138 at 143 [5]–[6]; [2007] HCA 47; Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union v Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd (2013) 248 CLR 619 at 632–633 [40]; [2013] HCA 99 Cf Singh v The Commonwealth (2004) 222 CLR 322 at 335–336 [19]; [2004] HCA 43. 100 480 US 522 at 526 (1987)......
  • National Disability Insurance Agency v WRMF
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 12 Mayo 2020
    ...232 CLR 138 at [5]-[7], affirmed by a unanimous High Court in Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union v Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 36; (2013) 248 CLR 619 at [40]. Nevertheless, just as a Court must assume Parliament chose words in an operative provision deliberately, so as t......
  • Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union v Railtrain Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 25 Octubre 2019
    ...as follows by Crennan, Kiefel, Bell, Gageler and Keane JJ in Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 36, (2013) 248 CLR 619 at 633-634:“Payment to an employee”[45] ... It is tolerably clear from the terms of s 323(3), and is confirmed by the Ex......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 firm's commentaries
  • High Court finds provision of accommodation is not a 'payment' prohibited during industrial action
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 28 Agosto 2013
    ...Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 36 (14 August 2013), the High Court of Australia held that the provision of on-site accommodation to employees during a period of protected industrial action was not a "payment" that was prohibited by the......
  • No Work but You Can Stay
    • Australia
    • JD Supra Australia
    • 23 Agosto 2013
    ...A unanimous decision of the High Court in Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) v Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 36 has shed light on the interpretation of "payment to an employee" in the context of protected industrial Overturning findings of the lower courts, the Hig......
  • Accommodation is not a 'payment' - the Mammoet Case
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 29 Agosto 2013
    ...have now had just over a week to consider the effect of the Mammoet Case (CFMEU v Mammoet [2013] HCA 36). In the Mammoet Case, the High Court unanimously allowed an appeal from a decision of the Federal Court of Australia, which held that the provision of accommodation to employees during a......
  • New financial year 2019-2020: Construction & Infrastructure
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 1 Julio 2019
    ...to homeowners, which in effect would reverse the High Court decision of Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 61288 [2013] HCA 36. We are yet to see the substance of the implementation of the NSW Government's response and pressure will build in the new financial year to ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Outside the Text: Inside the use of Extrinsic Materials in Statutory Interpretation
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 42-2, June 2014
    • 1 Junio 2014
    ...The Queen v Getachew (2012) 248 CLR 22 (various); Construction Forestry Mining & Energy Union v Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd (2013) 248 CLR 619 (explanatory memorandum and second reading speech). 2014 Outside the Text 347 ____________________________________________________________________......
  • Statutory Misinterpretation: Rash Holding in Brash Holdings
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 45-2, June 2017
    • 1 Junio 2017
    ...92 (2 007) 232 CLR 138, 143 [5] (emphasis added). See, eg, Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union v Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd (2013) 248 CLR 619, 632–3 [40] (Crennan, Kiefel, Bell, Gageler and Keane JJ); Baytech Trades Pty Ltd v Coinvest Ltd [2015] VSCA 342 (17 December 2015) [57] (M......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT