Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy Union v Pilbara Iron Company (Services) Pty Ltd (No 3)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation2012-0629 FCA J
Year2012
Date2012
CourtFederal Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
23 cases
  • Qantas Airways Ltd v Transport Workers' Union of Australia
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 4 Mayo 2022
    ...Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; 258 CLR 482 Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy Union v Pilbara Iron Company (Services) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 697 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Anglo Coal (Dawson Services) Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 157; 238 FCR 273 Construction, Forestry, ......
  • Fair Work Ombudsman v Foot & Thai Massage Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (No 4)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 14 Octubre 2021
    ...FCAFC 87; 59 AILR ¶100–686; 164 IR 299 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Pilbara Iron Company (Services) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 697; 64 AILR ¶101–659 Council of the NSW Bar Association v Power (2008) 71 NSWLR 451 Cummins South Pacific Pty Limited v Keenan [2020] FCAFC 204......
  • Alam v National Australia Bank Limited
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 8 Octubre 2021
    ...Ltd [2015] FCAFC 76, (2015) 231 FCR 150 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Pilbara Iron Company (Services) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 697 Cummins South Pacific Pty Ltd v Keenan [2020] FCAFC 204; (2020) 302 IR 400 Flageul v WeDrive Pty Ltd [2021] FCAFC 102 General Motors–Holden......
  • PIA Mortgage Services Pty Ltd v King
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 24 Febrero 2020
    ...Energy Union v Cahill (2010) 269 ALR 1 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Pilbara Iron Company (Services) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 697 Dafallah v Fair Work Commission (2014) 225 FCR 559 Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining......
  • Get Started for Free
4 firm's commentaries
  • Generally protected: a government’s capacity to regulate enterprise bargaining via procurement policy
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 10 Agosto 2013
    ...183 ALR 475; [2001] FCA 178 at [48]; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) v Pilbara Iron Co (Services) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 697; BC201204747 at [35]; Waugh v Kippen (1986) 160 CLR 156 at 164-5; 64 ALR 195; 60 ALJR 9Above, n 1, at [122]-[126]; above, n 2, at [89]-[93]......
  • The new untouchables - does adverse action mean that some employees are immune from dismissal?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 26 Abril 2015
    ...not among the reasons for her dismissal; see below). A similar approach was taken in a 2012 decision: CFMEU v Pilbara Iron Company (No 3) [2012] FCA 697. In that case, the fact that the employee had raised concerns or complaints about safety issues within the workplace was found to be the e......
  • Beware - Adverse action may result in reinstatement
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 19 Agosto 2012
    ...of an employee or an award of damages and compensation. However the recent case of CFMEU v Pilbara Iron Company (Services) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 697 highlights the possibility of reinstating employees subjected to adverse Darren Lamberth ('the Second Applicant'), who was a member of the......
  • When is a 'complaint' or 'inquiry' a 'workplace right' in adverse action?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 30 Noviembre 2014
    ...employee's complaints about other employees' working conditions fell within section 341(1)(c)(ii). In CFMEU v Pilbara Iron Company (No 3) [2012] FCA 697 the fact that the employee had raised concerns or complaints about safety issues within the workplace was found to be the exercise of work......
1 books & journal articles