Courtney v Medtel Pty Ltd (No 3)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation2004-0330 FCA F
Date2004
Year2004
CourtFederal Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
13 cases
  • Wu v Avin Operations Pty Ltd (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Barrett Property Group Ltd v Metricon Homes Pty Ltd (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 23 November 2007
    ...et D’Equipment des Constructions SA v First Melbourne Securities Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 660 discussed Courtney v Medtel Pty Limited (No 3) [2004] FCA 347 referred Dias Aluminium Products Pty Ltd v Ullrich Aluminium Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] FCA 1400 referred to Ian Duncan v Secretary, Department of......
  • Oliver Hume South East Queensland Pty Ltd v Barclay (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 18 November 2021
    ...attend the parties to the litigation, this set-off consideration may be somewhat less significant (Courtney v Medtel Pty Limited (No 3) [2004] FCA 347 at 9. Thirdly, a range of factors may justify departure from the ordinary rule: where the final determination of the proceedings is far away......
  • Wilson v Britten-Jones (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 4 February 2021
    ...Group Ltd (No 13) [1995] FCA 1459 Bailey v Beagle Management Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 60; 105 FCR 136 Courtney v Medtel Pty Limited (No 3) [2004] FCA 347 Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International B.V. (No 5) [2018] FCA 19 Life Airbag Company of Australia Pty Ltd v......
  • Get Started for Free