Cox v Tomat
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1972-0224 HCA B,[1972] HCA 10 |
| Year | 1972 |
| Date | 1972 |
| Court | High Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
1 cases
-
Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd v Victoria
...Commissioner of Taxation (NSW) (1937) 56 CLR 337; and for the road transport cases see Welker v Hewett (1969) 120 CLR 503; Cox v Tomat (1972) 126 CLR 105; cf SGH Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2002) 76 ALJR 780 at 798 [92]; 188 ALR 241 at 266. 135 Explained in Union Steamship Co of Austral......
1 books & journal articles
-
Federal Limitations on the Legislative Power of the States and the Commonwealth to Bind One Another
...AC 331; Ex parte Iskra [1963] SR (NSW) 538; O'Sullivan v Dejneko (1964) 110 CLR 498; Welker v Hewett (1969) 120 CLR 503; Cox v Tomat (1971) 126 CLR 105. 132 Broken Hill South Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (NSW) (1937) 56 CLR 337, 356 (Latham CJ). 2003 Federal Limitations on the Legislative......