Crafter v Kelly
| Jurisdiction | South Australia |
| Year | 1941 |
| Court | Supreme Court of South Australia |
| Date | 1941 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd v Maxwell; Cooper v Maxwell; Mirror Group Newspapers Plc v Maxwell
...appears to be the approach of the Australian courts: see Warnecke v. Pope per Napier C.J. and Abbott J. at p. 119 and Crafter v. Kelly [1941] S.A.S.R. 237 per Angus-Parsons J. and Murray C.J. at p. 242. But similar provisions are to be found in sections 41(9) and 42(4) of the Banking Act 19......
-
Szoma v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
...gives effect to the object of the section. The meaning of 'lawful' depends on its context, as Napier J pointed out in Crafter v Kelly [ [1941] SASR 237 at 243]. As a result, a 'lawful purpose' may mean a purpose not forbidden by law or not unlawful under the statute that enacts the term…; o......
-
R (Tesfamichael) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...that meaning best gives effect to the object of the section. The meaning of ‘lawful' depends on its context, as Napier J pointed out in Crafter v Kelly [1941] SASR 237, 243. As a result, a ‘lawful purpose' may mean a purpose not forbidden by law or not unlawful under the statute that enact......
-
Szoma v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 64 CIS 2091 2001
...gives effect to the object of the section. The meaning of ‘lawful’ depends on its context, as Napier J pointed out in Crafter v Kelly [[1941] SASR 237 at 243]. As a result, a ‘lawful purpose’ may mean a purpose not forbidden by law or not unlawful under the statute that enacts the term … ; ......
Request a trial to view additional results