Craig v South Australia
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1995-1024 HCA A,[1995] HCA 58 |
| Date | 1995 |
| Year | 1995 |
| Court | High Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
1111 cases
3 firm's commentaries
-
Reviewing a BIFA adjudication decision ' Number 1 complete guide
...to attempt to mark the metes and bounds of jurisdictional error". However, by reference to the decision in Craig v South Australia [1995] HCA 58; (1995) 184 CLR 163, 177-178, the majority identified three categories of jurisdictional error (Kirk at (1) the mistaken denial or assertion of ju......
-
Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales: The Demise of State Privative Clauses
...the English position that any error of law will render a decision ultra vires. Furthermore, the High Court in Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 had applied the distinction between jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional errors differently as between an administrative tribunal and an ......
-
MAS Proper Officer's Decision To Reject Application In Error Is Subject To Judicial Review
...to make the decision on behalf of the Authority where the challenge is one of an administrative law nature Footnotes 1 Patten AJ 2 (1995) 184 CLR 163 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your speci......
30 books & journal articles
-
Judicial review of migration decisions: ousting the Hickman private clause?
...(1994) 182 CLR 104, 196 (McHugh J) (102) Jeremy Kirk, `Administrative Justice and the Australian Constitution', above n 90, 85-7. (103) (1995) 184 CLR 163, 179. See also Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323,351-2 (McHugh, Gummow and Hayne JJ). (104) ......
-
The principle of open justice and the judicial duty to give public reasons.
...H Baker (ed), Judicial Records, Law Reports, and the Growth of Case Law (Duncker & Humblot, 1989) 15. In Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163, the High Court of Australia held that the reasons of an inferior court did not form part of the 'court record' for the purposes of certior......
-
Judicial Review of Migration Decisions: Life after S157
...15 NAAV (2002) 123 FCR 298, 475 [625] (von Doussa J). 16 (1995) 184 CLR 163, 179 ('Craig'), where it was said that if an administrative tribunal falls into an error of law which causes it to identify a wrong issue, to ask itself a wrong question, to ignore relevant material, to rely on irre......
-
Federal Constitutional Influences on State Judicial Review
...in Robin Creyke and Patrick Keyser (eds), The Brennan Legacy – Blowing in the Winds of Legal Orthodoxy (Federation Press, 2002) 67. 18 (1995) 184 CLR 163. 19 Ibid 179. 20 Ibid 178–80. 21 (2003) 211 CLR 476 ('Plaintiff S157/2002'). 22 Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessme......
Get Started for Free