Da Costa v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1968-0822 HCA A,[1968] HCA 51 |
| Date | 1968 |
| Year | 1968 |
| Court | High Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
19 cases
-
Braysich v The Queen
...omitted); [2005] HCA 34, and see Pemble v The Queen (1971) 124 CLR 107 at 117–118 per Barwick CJ; [1971] HCA 20. 46Da Costa v The Queen (1968) 118 CLR 186 at 213–215 per Owen J, Kitto, Menzies and Windeyer JJ agreeing; [1968] HCA 51; Lee Chun-Chuen v The Queen [1963] AC 220 at 229–230 per L......
- Johnson v R
-
Conway v R
...refuse a new trial in an appeal from the Northern Territory on the ground that no substantial miscarriage of justice had occurred. In Da Costa v The Queen82, Owen J thought that, when evidence was wrongly admitted, the Court could not refuse to order a new trial. But in the same case, Winde......
-
Heron v R
...206 at 211. 30 [1957] AC 635 at 642. 31Parker v The Queen (1964) 111 CLR 665 at 681-682; [1964] AC 1369 at 1392; Da Costa v The Queen (1968) 118 CLR 186 at 213; Van Den Hoek v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 158 at 161-162, 169. See also Pemble v The Queen (1971) 124 CLR 107 at 117-118, 32Mancini ......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
The Paradox of Disallowing Duress as a Defence to Murder
...is known as the doctrine of excessive self-defence or excessive-force-manslaughter: R v Bozikis [1981] VR 587; Da Costa v The Queen (1968) 118 CLR 186; R v Howe (1958) 100 CLR 448, but see Zecevic v Director of Public Prosecutions (1987) 71 ALR 641, a case in which the High Court abolished ......
-
Judicial Review and Merits Review: Are the Boundaries Being Eroded?
...and Anthony Groves, Judicial Review of Administrative Action (Thomson Reuters, 5th ed, 2013) 203 n 113. 63 Da Costa v The Queen (1968) 118 CLR 186, 194–5 (Windeyer J). 64 OV and OW v Members of The Board of The Wesley Mission Council (2010) 79 NSWLR 606, 610 [8] (Allsop P). 2017 Judicial Re......