Daniel (for the Ngarluma, Yindjibarndi, Yaburara, Mardudhunera and Wong-goo-tt-oo Peoples) v Western Australia
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Year | 2000 |
| Date | 2000 |
| Court | Federal Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 cases
-
Lithgow City Council v Jackson
...under the common law …, s 78 expands the scope for such evidence.’ This is a common view: see, for example, Daniel v Western Australia (2000) 178 ALR 542 at 546–547 [17]. Its correctness depends on the assumption that the common law ‘classes of cases’ comprised a narrow closed category — ‘a......
-
Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar
...that questions of admissibility should not be the prime determinant of admissibility is novel. In Daniel v Western Australia (2000) 178 ALR 542 at 546 [16] R D Nicholson J recorded Branson J's view, but the challenge to the evidence in that case did not depend on its validity, and the refer......
-
Alphapharm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S
...the Evidence Act) was referred to by Finkelstein J in Quick v Stoland at 382 and by Nicholson J in Daniel v State of Western Australia (2000) 178 ALR 542 at [30]-[34]. 773 Section 136 of the Evidence Act is entitled “General discretion to limit use of evidence” and provides: The court may l......
-
Bodney v Bennell
...Sampi v Western Australia [2005] FCA 777 cited Jango v Northern Territory (No 4) 214 ALR 608 cited Daniel v Western Australia (2000) 178 ALR 542 cited Quick v Stoland Pty Ltd (1998) 87 FCR 371 cited Lardil, Kaiadilt, Yangkaal, Gangalidda Peoples v Queensland [2000] FCA 1548 cited Harrington......
Get Started for Free