Daniel McElholum v Callum Andrew Hughes

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory
JudgeRefshauge J:
Judgment Date24 April 2015
Date24 April 2015
CourtSupreme Court of ACT
Docket NumberFile Number(s): SCA 27 of 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 cases
  • The Queen v Joshua Thomas Hile
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • June 11, 2015
    ...145 CLR 395 DSJ v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (2012) 215 A Crim R 349 Dupas v The Queen (2012) 40 VR 182 McElholum v Hughes [2015] ACTSC 78 Oakley v Hyslop [2014] ACTSC 314 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 R v DM [2010] ACTSC 137 R v Forbes [2006] ACTSC 47 R v Ford (2......
  • The Queen v John Jerome Papalii
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • June 22, 2015
    ...Public Prosecutions v Grabovac [1998] 1 VR 664 Gordon (1994) 71 A Crim R 459 Griffiths v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 293 McElholum v Hughes [2015] ACTSC 78 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120 R v Barker [2014] ACTSC 374 R v Dixon Jenkins (1991) 55 A Crim R 308 R v Fiorenti (Unreported, V......