Daniel McElholum v Callum Andrew Hughes
| Jurisdiction | Australian Capital Territory |
| Judge | Refshauge J: |
| Judgment Date | 24 April 2015 |
| Date | 24 April 2015 |
| Court | Supreme Court of ACT |
| Docket Number | File Number(s): SCA 27 of 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 cases
-
The Queen v Joshua Thomas Hile
...145 CLR 395 DSJ v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (2012) 215 A Crim R 349 Dupas v The Queen (2012) 40 VR 182 McElholum v Hughes [2015] ACTSC 78 Oakley v Hyslop [2014] ACTSC 314 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 R v DM [2010] ACTSC 137 R v Forbes [2006] ACTSC 47 R v Ford (2......
-
The Queen v John Jerome Papalii
...Public Prosecutions v Grabovac [1998] 1 VR 664 Gordon (1994) 71 A Crim R 459 Griffiths v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 293 McElholum v Hughes [2015] ACTSC 78 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120 R v Barker [2014] ACTSC 374 R v Dixon Jenkins (1991) 55 A Crim R 308 R v Fiorenti (Unreported, V......