David Grant & Company Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation;Ferndell Development Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation;Fendall Farms Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1995-1011 HCA B,[1995] HCA 43 |
| Date | 1995 |
| Year | 1995 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
294 cases
3 firm's commentaries
-
Statutory demands how to make them and how to resist them
...is a valid application filed and served to set the demand aside. (See David Grant & Co Pty Limited v Westpac Banking Corporation [1995] HCA 43.) In those circumstances, if the demand is pressed, the only way of dealing with the demand is to pay the disputed debt (assuming there are reso......
-
Statutory demands - how to make them and how to resist them
...1426 27 First State Computing Pty Limited v Kyling (1995) 13 ACLC 939 28 David Grant & Co Pty Limited v Westpac Banking Corporation [1995] HCA 43 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific...
-
Statutory Demand ' a complete guide
...time limit to set aside a statutory demand is the High Court of Australia case of David Grant & Co Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation [1995] HCA 43 who The court may make an order extending the period for compliance with the statutory demand. If the company applies "in accordance with se......
3 books & journal articles
-
The Courts Make a New Friend? Amicus Curiae Jurisdiction in Ireland
...Judiciary Act, 1903. "' (1988) 83 ALR 79, at 93. 119 Ibid., at 95. 120 See, David Grant & Co Pty Lid v. Westpac Banking Corporation (1995) 184 CLR 265. 121 See, South Australia v. Tanner (1989) 166 CLR 161 at 179-180. 122 [1997] HCA 31, at 49; [1997] 189 CLR 579, at 597. 123 See, The "Killa......
-
RIGHTS, DUTIES AND THE VALIDATION OF IRREGULARITIES
...however, while it is a matter of substance, one might not be able to predicate invalidity of the acquisition power on this. 32[1995] HCA 43, (1995) 13 ACLC 1572, (1995) 69 ALJR 778, (1995) 131 ALR 353, (1995) 184 CLR 265, (1995) 18 ACSR 225. 33David Grant & Co v WestpacUNK[1995] HCA 43, (19......
-
From Stepping-Stones to Throwing Stones: Officers’ Liability for Corporate Compliance Failures after Cassimatis
...of Australia (1932) 47 CLR 1, 7 (Gavan Duffy CJ and Dixon J) (‘Anthony Hordern’); David Grant & Co PtyLtd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1995) 184 CLR 265, 276 (Gummow J, Brennan CJ, Dawson J, Gaudron J andMcHugh J agreeing).115. Cassimatis Appeal (n 4) 597 [286].116. Ibid 554 [77].20 Feder......