David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1992] HCA 48,1992-1007 HCA B
Date1992
Year1992
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
226 cases
3 firm's commentaries
  • Property & Projects - What's News - 2 June 2015
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 9 June 2015
    ...and respondent retained no proceeds of sale — Unjust to order restitution — David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1992] HCA 48; (1992) 175 CLR 353 — Australian Financial Services and Leasing Pty Limited v Hills Industries Limited [2014] HCA 14; (2014) 307 ALR 512. Owner......
  • Competition & Consumer Law News – 5 July 2017
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 6 July 2017
    ...- Whether restitution unjust because of misrepresentations as to loan amount - David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1992] HCA 48; (1992) 175 CLR 353; Dextra Bank & Trust Co Ltd v Bank of Jamaica [2001] UKPC 50; [2002] 1 All ER (Comm) 193 considered. EQUITY - Subrog......
  • Australian Financial Services and Leasing Pty Ltd v Hills Industries Ltd
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 30 November 2014
    ...Banking Corp (1988) 164 CLR 662; 78 ALR 157; 62 ALJR 292; BC8802661 and David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353; 109 ALR 57; 66 ALJR 768; BC9202662. 10 Australian Broadcasting Corp v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199 at 227; 185 ALR 1; [2001] H......
9 books & journal articles
  • Pleading and proving foreign law in Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 31 No. 2, August 2007
    • 1 August 2007
    ...Bank of Bahrain EC v Beximco Pharmaceuticals LM [2004] 1 WLR 1784. But see David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353; Kleinwort Benson Lid v Lincoln City Council [1999] 2 AC (112) Neilson (2005) 223 CLR 331,370 (Gummow and Hayne JJ). But see Puttick [2006]......
  • Restitution
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...of state of minds between sheer ignorance to positive but incorrect belief (David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia(1992) 175 CLR 353 at 374; Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group Plc v IRC[2007] 1 AC 558 at [65]), and it was pointed out by the court in Mok Kwong Yue v Ding Leng ......
  • The Rise and Fall of the Mistake of Law Rule
    • Ireland
    • Trinity College Law Review No. III-2000, January 2000
    • 1 January 2000
    ...there a mistake; (ii) Did the mistake cause the payment; (iii) Did the payee have a right to receive the sum that was paid to him." 42 (1992) 175 CLR 353. 41 (1969) 103 ILTR 73. 44 Ibid., per Budd J., at 89. 2000] The Mistake of Law Rule reference to fundamental mistake. Recognition of unju......
  • Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment, vols.1-2.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 35 No. 3, December 2011
    • 1 December 2011
    ...108, 144. (40) Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137, 153 (Toohey J); David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353, 370, 385 n 20 (Mason CJ, Deane, Toobey, Gaudron and McHugh JJ), 398, 399 n 69 (Brennan J) ('David Securities'); Giumelli v Giumelli (199......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT