Davies and Cody v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation[1937] HCA 27
Date1937
Year1937

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
52 cases
  • Theow Say Kow @ Teoh Kiang Seng, Henry v Graceful Frontier Sdn Bhd &Ors and Other Appeals
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Evans v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 13 December 2007
    ... ... 130 (1981) 145 CLR 395 at 426–427. See also Gibbs CJ at 399, and Davies and Cody v The King (1937) 57 CLR 170 at 181–183 per Latham CJ, Rich, Dixon, Evatt and McTiernan JJ ... 131 He referred to R v Clout (1995) ... ...
  • Cesan v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 6 November 2008
    ...319 at 331. 49 (2002) 212 CLR 124 at 147 [73]. 50 (2006) 80 ALJR 614 at 617 [3]; 225 ALR 161 at 162 citing Davies and Cody v The King (1937) 57 CLR 170 at 180; [1937] HCA 27 and Ratten v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 510 at 516 per Barwick CJ; [1974] HCA 35. 51 (2006) 80 ALJR 614 at 617 [6]; 2......
  • Patel v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 24 August 2012
    ... ... of Inquiry Amendment Order (No 1) 2005 (Q) , published in Queensland Government Gazette , E22, 23 September 2005 (report published as Davies, Queensland Public Hospitals Commission of Inquiry:Report , (2005)); Forster, Queensland Health Systems Review:Final Report , (2005) ... ...
  • Get Started for Free