Davis v Bunn
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 1936 |
| Neutral Citation | 1936-0909 HCA A,[1936] HCA 44 |
| Date | 1936 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Lindsay v Mid Western Health Board
...merely of "the general method of inferring one or more facts in issue from circumstances proved in evidence". (Davis .v. Bunn (1936) 56 C.L.R. 246 at 19 I, too, would adopt this as an apt description of the scope of the maxim. 20 Mr. Justice Andrews went on to say:- 21 The human body is not......
- Nominal Defendant v Haslbauer
-
Swain v Waverley Municipal Council
...in Hocking v Bell (1947) 75 CLR 125. 177 For example Luxton v Vines (1952) 85 CLR 352; Holloway v McFeeters (1956) 94 CLR 470. 178 (1936) 56 CLR 246 at 179 Supreme Court Act, s 108(3). 180 Swain [2003] Aust Torts Reports ¶81–694 at 63,782–63,783 [145]. 181 Swain [2003] Aust Torts Reports ¶8......
- Latitude Fisheries Pty Ltd v Australian Fisheries Management Authority
Request a trial to view additional results