Deatons Pty Ltd v Flew

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1949] HCA 60,1949-1212 HCA B
Year1949
Date1949
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
58 cases
3 firm's commentaries
  • Frolics Or Authorised Acts?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 15 April 2008
    ...own.' Sprod appealed the decision. Appeal The Court of Appeal had regard to the High Court's decision in Deatons Pty Limited v Flew (1949) 79 CLR 370 (generally regarded as the starting point when considering vicarious liability in Australia) and the more recent High Court decision in State......
  • ' Vicarious Liability Of An Employer For An Intentional Tort By Its Employee - S 3B (1) CLA' : Zorom Enterprises Pty Ltd -V- Zabow & Ors [2007] NSWCA 106
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 26 June 2007
    ...for unauthorised acts if they may be regarded as modes - although improper modes - of exercising authority: Deatons Pty Ltd v Flew (1949) 79 CLR 370; State of New South Wales v Lepore (2003) 212 CLR An employer will be vicariously liable for the intentional tort of an employee where the con......
  • Employer's vicarious liability - no laughing matter for pranksters
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 1 August 2012
    ...is the irrelevance of the employee's state of mind while committing the wrong. Harper JA noted the decision of Deatons Pty Ltd v Flew (1949) 79 CLR 370 where it was held that spite was irrelevant in determining whether an employer was liable or not for the actions of an employee; the fact t......
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT