Dee Trading Company Pty Ltd v Baldwin

JurisdictionVictoria
Date1938
CourtSupreme Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • HSBC Rail (UK) Ltd v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd (Formerly Railtrack Plc)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 November 2005
    ...The cases do not, however, assist much or at all on the amount of damages which the owner is entitled to recover. In both Mears and Dee Trading Co v Baldwin [1938] VLR 173, a case from the state of Victoria to which we were also referred, the chattel had not been repaired at the time when t......
  • HSBC Rail (UK) Ltd v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd (Formerly Railtrack Plc)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 16 March 2005
    ...and might have been expected, as between themselves and the plaintiff, to repair for themselves. Similarly, in the Australian case of Dee Trading v. Baldwin a finance company was held able to recover for damage to a car let out on hire purchase to a customer even though the hirer was himsel......
  • HSBC Rail (UK) Ltd v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 November 2005
    ...TheELR [1977] AC 774. Bradburn v Great Western Railway CoELR (1874) LR 10 Ex 1. Charlotte, TheELR [1908] P 206. Dee Trading Co v Baldwin [1938] VLR 173. East West Corp v DKBS AF 1912 A/S [2003] 1 CLC 797; [2003] QB 1509. Ehmler v HallUNK [1993] 1 EGLR 137. General Accident Fire and Life Ass......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT