Dee Trading Company Pty Ltd v Baldwin

JurisdictionVictoria
Date1938
Year1938
CourtSupreme Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • HSBC Rail (UK) Ltd v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd (Formerly Railtrack Plc)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 November 2005
    ...do not, however, assist much or at all on the amount of damages which the owner is entitled to recover. In both Mears and Dee Trading Co v Baldwin [1938] VLR 173, a case from the state of Victoria to which we were also referred, the chattel had not been repaired at the time when the action ......
  • HSBC Rail (UK) Ltd v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 November 2005
    ...however, assist much or at all on the amount of damages which the owner is entitled to recover. In both Mears and Dee Trading Co v Baldwin[1938] VLR 173, a case from the state of Victoria to which we were also referred, the chattel had not been repaired at the time when the action was broug......
  • HSBC Rail (UK) Ltd v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd (Formerly Railtrack Plc)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 16 March 2005
    ...and might have been expected, as between themselves and the plaintiff, to repair for themselves. Similarly, in the Australian case of Dee Trading v. Baldwin a finance company was held able to recover for damage to a car let out on hire purchase to a customer even though the hirer was himsel......