Deeble v Nott
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1941-0421 HCA C,[1941] HCA 11 |
| Date | 1941 |
| Year | 1941 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
- Government Insurance Office Ofnew South Wales v King
- Phillips v Ellinson Brothers Pty Ltd
-
Tania Joy Lamb v The Attorney-General
...in s 4(7) is imposed by reference to the class of damage (bodily injury) for which relief is claimed, at 123. 22 Deeble v Nott (1941) 65 CLR 104. 23 In Maxwell, the alleged “bodily injury” was the suffering of inconvenience and mental anxiety. It appears to have been accepted that the claim......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Does A Dramatic Physiological Change Or Disturbance Fall Within The Definition Of An Injury Pursuant To The Safety, Rehabilitation And Compensation Act 1988?
...the course of employment need not be direct but that the connection must not, as a matter of common sense, be too remote (Deeble v Nott (1941) 65 CLR 104). The autopsy report obtained described the cause of death "mild haemorrhage under the membrane(s) of the brain with acute myocardial inf......