Dietrich v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 1992 |
| Neutral Citation | 1992-1113 HCA A,[1992] HCA 57 |
| Date | 1992 |
| Year | 1992 |
| Court | High Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
330 cases
- Accc v Leelee Pty Ltd
- O'Donoghue v Honourable Brendan O'Connor (No 2)
-
Balasundaram v Public Prosecutor
...late notice to the court. Thus, he ought not to be penalized for it. Counsel for the appellant cited the case of Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292 in support of his contention. Olaf Dietrich was charged before the County Court at Melbourne, Australia, with offences against the Customs......
- Phong v Attorney-General (Cth)
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Miranda Rights: Do you have the right to remain silent in Australia?
...it has been held that trials should proceed without representation for the accused in exceptional cases only (Dietrich v The Queen [1992] HCA 57). When an accused person, through no fault of their own, does not have legal representation when charged with a serious offence, a judge may order......
-
The impact of juror misconduct on the right to a fair trial
...the High Court of Australia has described it as "being a central pillar of our criminal justice system"; Dietrich v The Queen [1992] HCA 57. And while the common law right has many aspects, one of the most important is the right to be adjudicated by a fact-finder (whether a magistrate, judg......
51 books & journal articles
-
National litigation and international law: repercussions for Australia's protection of marine resources.
...(1982) 153 CLR 168, 211-12 (Stephen J), (224-5) (Mason J); Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550, 570 (Gibbs CJ); Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292, 305 (Mason CJ and McHugh (94) See Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273, 291 (Mason CJ and Deane J): r......
-
Judicial review of migration decisions: ousting the Hickman private clause?
...57, 123. See also at 121. (108) Ibid 123. See also Abebe (1999) 197 CLR 510, 583-4. (109) Polyukhovich (1991) 172 CLR 501; R v Dietrich (1992) 177 CLR 292; Leeth v Commonwealth (1992) 174 CLR 455; Kable v DPP (NSW) (1996) 189 CLR (110) Evidence to Senate Legal and Constitutional Legislation......
-
Arbitrate this! Enforcing foreign arbitral awards and chapter III of the Constitution.
...Polyukhovich v Commonwealth (1991) 172 CLR 501,612 (Dearie J), 685-6, 689 (Toohey J), 704-5 (Gaudron J). (204) See Dietrich v ?he Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292, 326 (Deane J), 362 (Gaudron J); Wheeler, "Due Process', above n 182, 205-6, (205) See Boilermakers (1956) 94 CLR 254, 275-6 (Dixon C J,......
-
Territory Courts and Federal Jurisdiction
...41, 123 (Deane J); Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1, 15 (Mason CJ and McHugh J), 57–8, 69 (Brennan J); Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292, 297–8, 306–7, 311 (Mason CJ and McHugh J), 316 (Brennan J), 327 (Deane J); Environment Protection Authority v Caltex Refining Co Pty Ltd (......
Get Started for Free