Dietrich v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date1992
Neutral Citation1992-1113 HCA A,[1992] HCA 57
Date1992
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
325 cases
  • Singh v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Phong v Attorney-General (Cth)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Hinds v Attorney General of Barbados and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 5 December 2001
    ...Re Ewing and The Queen (1974) 49 DLR (3d) 619; R v Rowbotham 41 (1988) CCC (3d) 1 (Ontario Court of Appeal); Dietrich v Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292; R v Wood (2001) 49 WCB (2d) 160 (Nova Scotia Court of Appeal); Queen v Magda (2001) 50 WCB (2d) 112 (Ontario Superior 13 Mr Guthrie submitted, se......
  • Eastman v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 25 May 2000
    ...191 CLR 417 at 434–435; Krakouer v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 202 at 225. On the accused's right to a fair trial see Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292 at 311, 314–315 per Mason CJ and McHugh 308 cf Cameron v Cole (1944) 68 CLR 571 at 589–590. 309Polyukhovich v The Commonwealth (War Crim......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • The impact of juror misconduct on the right to a fair trial
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 7 November 2022
    ...the High Court of Australia has described it as "being a central pillar of our criminal justice system"; Dietrich v The Queen [1992] HCA 57. And while the common law right has many aspects, one of the most important is the right to be adjudicated by a fact-finder (whether a magistrate, judg......
  • Miranda Rights: Do you have the right to remain silent in Australia?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 19 January 2023
    ...it has been held that trials should proceed without representation for the accused in exceptional cases only (Dietrich v The Queen [1992] HCA 57). When an accused person, through no fault of their own, does not have legal representation when charged with a serious offence, a judge may order......
54 books & journal articles
  • Arbitrate this! Enforcing foreign arbitral awards and chapter III of the Constitution.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 34 No. 2, August 2010
    • 1 August 2010
    ...Polyukhovich v Commonwealth (1991) 172 CLR 501,612 (Dearie J), 685-6, 689 (Toohey J), 704-5 (Gaudron J). (204) See Dietrich v ?he Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292, 326 (Deane J), 362 (Gaudron J); Wheeler, "Due Process', above n 182, 205-6, (205) See Boilermakers (1956) 94 CLR 254, 275-6 (Dixon C J,......
  • Judicial review of migration decisions: ousting the Hickman private clause?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 26 No. 3, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...57, 123. See also at 121. (108) Ibid 123. See also Abebe (1999) 197 CLR 510, 583-4. (109) Polyukhovich (1991) 172 CLR 501; R v Dietrich (1992) 177 CLR 292; Leeth v Commonwealth (1992) 174 CLR 455; Kable v DPP (NSW) (1996) 189 CLR (110) Evidence to Senate Legal and Constitutional Legislation......
  • National litigation and international law: repercussions for Australia's protection of marine resources.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 33 No. 1, April 2009
    • 1 April 2009
    ...(1982) 153 CLR 168, 211-12 (Stephen J), (224-5) (Mason J); Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550, 570 (Gibbs CJ); Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292, 305 (Mason CJ and McHugh (94) See Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273, 291 (Mason CJ and Deane J): r......
  • A Minimalist Charter of Rights for Australia: The UK or Canada as a Model?
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 37-3, September 2009
    • 1 September 2009
    ...see Al-Kateb (2004) 219 CLR 562, 590 (McHugh J) (arguing that the principle is firmly established). 15 See, eg, Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292; Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1, 42 (Brennan CJ). 16 See Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520 (freedom......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT