Dobbs v National Bank of Australasia Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date1935
Neutral Citation1935-0701 HCA B,[1935] HCA 49
Date1935
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
55 cases
4 firm's commentaries
  • Is Your Conclusive Evidence Clause Really Conclusive?
    • Singapore
    • Mondaq Singapore
    • 18 Septiembre 2023
    ...Co (London) Ltd v Banque Vernes et Commerciale de Paris SA [1973] 2 Lloyd's Rep 437. 7 Dobbs v The National Bank of Australasia Limited (1935) 53 CLR 643. 8 Pertamina at 9 ibid at [63]. 10 Bache & Co (London) Ltd v Banque Vernes et Commerciale de Paris SA [1973] 2 Lloyd's Rep 437 at 440. 11......
  • Inside track: Competition and Consumer Law - In the media and recent cases
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 25 Octubre 2019
    ...by ss 55 and 56 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) - provision not picked up. EVIDENCE - no Dobbs v National bank of Australasia Limited [1935] HCA 49; (1935) 53 CLR 643 certificate proving debt - Bank tendered some business records and adduced some evidence relevant to proving debt - whether e......
  • Strategies to reduce risk with the right contract terms and conditions
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 6 Junio 2022
    ...context which requires the plaintiff/creditor to prove various aspects of its case. See, Dobbs v National Bank of Australasia Ltd [1935] HCA 49. Privacy clause. Creditors may also wish include a clause enabling the creditor to undertake credit worthiness checks at the time of opening the ac......
  • High Court settles heated constitutional challenge to international arbitration
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 5 Abril 2013
    ...at p.14 4 imprimatur: meaning a licence to print or publish 5 Plaintiff's Submissions at p.15 6 Dobbs v National Bank of Australasia [1935] HCA 49 7 The intervener's primary submission was that the Model Law (given effect by the IAA) gives the courts "the classically judicial function of up......
3 books & journal articles
  • RESTRAINING A CALL ON A PERFORMANCE BOND: SHOULD ‘FRAUD OR UNCONSCIONABILITY’ BE THE NEW ORTHODOXY?
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2000, December 2000
    • 1 Diciembre 2000
    ...LR 389, at 419. 52 [1996] 1 MLJ 425. 53 Ibid, at 443. 54 [1973] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 437, at 440. See also Dobbs v National Bank of Australia(1935) 53 CLR 643; Chartered Electronics Industries Pte Ltd v The Development Bank of Singapore, High Court Suit No 485 of 1990, 30 April 1992, unreported, a......
  • Contract administration
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume I - Third Edition
    • 13 Abril 2020
    ...Co v United States , 241 US 387 (1916); United States v Moorman , 338 US 457 (1950). 87 Dobbs v National Bank of Australasia Ltd (1934) 53 CLR 643 at 652. See also paragraphs 5.158–5.159. 88 Young v Smith (1879) Hudson’s BC (4th edition, volume 2) 70 at 73, per Field J; RB Burden Ltd v Swan......
  • Dispute resolution
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • 13 Abril 2020
    ...v Resolute Ltd [2000] WASC 284 (18 BCL 41). 202 Czarnikow v Roth Schmidt & Co [1922] 2 KB 478; Dobbs v National Bank of Australasia Ltd (1934) 53 CLR 643 at 652–654; Lee v Showmens’ Guild of Great Britain [1952] 2 QB 329 at 342; Compagnie des Messageries Maritimes v Wilson (1954) 94 CLR 577......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT