Doggett v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | Gleeson CJ,Gaudron,Callinan JJ,McHugh J,Kirby J |
| Judgment Date | 09 August 2001 |
| Neutral Citation | 2001-0809 HCA B,[2001] HCA 46 |
| Date | 09 August 2001 |
| Court | High Court |
| Docket Number | B54/2000 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
74 cases
-
R v Tang
...87 at 103; 80 ALR 161 at 171; [1988] HCA 39; Zoneff v. RUNK(2000) 200 CLR 234; 172 ALR 1; [2000] HCA 28 at paras. 65–7; Doggett v. RUNK(2001) 208 CLR 343; 182 ALR 1; [2001] HCA 46 at para. 2 per Gleeson 148R v. Tang(2007) 16 VR 454; [2007] VSCA 134 at paras. 77, 124 and 145 (Tang). 149 Sect......
-
Tully v R
...justification for judicial intervention in the fact-finding process of present relevance was identified in Longman v The Queen 100 and Doggett v The Queen101 as a judicial concern that the lay mind may not be alert to the forensic disadvantages which may be suffered by an accused by reason ......
- Moloney v New Zealand
-
Conway v R
...166. But hearing such evidence is most exceptional in this Court. Objective analysis of its content is therefore obligatory. 92 In Doggett v The Queen167, this Court found a material misdirection by the trial judge. There too, there was a secret recording of a conversation with the appellan......
Request a trial to view additional results