O'donoghue v Ireland; Zentai v Republic of Hungary; Williams v United States of America

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGleeson CJ.,Gummow,Hayne,Heydon,Crennan,Kiefel JJ.,Kirby J.
Judgment Date23 April 2008
Neutral Citation[2008] HCA 14,2008-0423 HCA B
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberP40/2007, P41/2007 & S410/2007
Date23 April 2008
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
18 cases
  • Wurridjal v The Commonwealth of Australia
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • February 2, 2009
    ...Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391 at 473–474 [250]–[252] per Gummow and Hayne JJ; [2001] HCA 51; O'Donoghue v Ireland (2008) 234 CLR 599 at 614 [14] per Gleeson CJ; [2008] HCA 483Minister of State for the Army v Dalziel (1944) 68 CLR 261 at 290 per Starke J; [1944] HCA 4. See......
  • Attorney-General (Cth) v Huynh
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • May 10, 2023
    ...(1995) 184 CLR 348 at 364-365. See also Wilson v Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs (1996) 189 CLR 1 at 13. 79 (2008) 234 CLR 599. 80 cf O'Donoghue v Ireland (2008) 234 CLR 599 at 618 81 See Knight v Victoria (2017) 261 CLR 306 at 324 [32], 326 [37]. 82 On appeal to ......
  • Minister for Home Affairs v Zentai [Australia, High Court.]
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • August 15, 2012
    ...585; 240 ALR 56; [2007] FCAFC 48. 11 The respondent's challenge was heard concurrently with two other matters: O'Donoghue v. IrelandUNK(2008) 234 CLR 599; 244 ALR 404; [2008] HCA 12Zentai v. Republic of Hungary[2009] FCA 284. 13Zentai v. Republic of HungaryUNK(2009) 180 FCR 225; 260 ALR 400......
  • Minister for Home Affairs of the Commonwealth v Zentai
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • August 15, 2012
    ...(II.5.) ME on People's Jurisdiction enacted by Act VII of 1945 and amended and complemented by Decree No 1440/1945 (V.1.) ME. 9Zentai v Republic of Hungary (2006) 153 FCR 10Zentai v Republic of Hungary (2007) 157 FCR 585. 11 The respondent's challenge was heard concurrently with two other m......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • The Legal Personality of the Commonwealth of Australia
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 47-1, March 2019
    • March 1, 2019
    ...Cross v Barnes Towing and Salvage (Qld) Pty Ltd (2005) 232 ALR 209, 219 [35] (Spigelman CJ)(emphasis added).190. O’Donoghue v Ireland (2008) 234 CLR 599, 631 [87] (Kirby J) (emphasis added).191. British American Tobacco Australia Ltd v Western Australia (2003) 217 CLR 30, 73–4 [113] (Kirby ......
  • The Convergence of form and Function: Commentary on Dixon
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 43-3, September 2015
    • September 1, 2015
    ...234 CLR 418, 459–64 [33]–[48] (Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Kirby, Hayne, Crennan and Kiefel JJ), in relation to s 92; O’Donoghue v Ireland (2008) 234 CLR 599, 625–6 [55]–[57] (Gummow, Hayne, Heydon, Crennan and Kiefel JJ), in relation to implications from federalism; Grollo v Palmer (1995) 184 CLR ......
  • Introduction
    • Australia
    • University of Western Australia Law Review No. 39-2, September 2015
    • September 1, 2015
    ...Opportunity Commission in 1996. Peter’s talents were by no means confined to the law. In his younger days 7Zentai v Republic of Hungary [2008] HCA 14; Minister for Home Affairs of the Commonwealth v Zentai [2012] HCA 28. 8Stanford v Stanford [2012] HCA 52. 6 University of Western Australia ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT