Dorajay Pty Ltd v Aristocrat Leisure Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation2005-0513 FCA H
Date2005
Year2005
CourtFederal Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
16 cases
  • Phillis v Mandic
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Chandrasekaran v Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 16 October 2019
    ...43 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v ACN 000 247 601 Pty Limited (in liq) [2006] FCA 1416 Dorajay Pty Limited v Aristocrat Leisure Limited [2005] FCA 588 Haile-Michael v Konstantinidis (No 3) [2013] FCA 53 Kaboko Mining Limited v Van Heerden [2016] FCA 1532 Kowalski v MMAL Staff Superannuati......
  • Mayfield Development Corporation Pty Ltd v NSW Ports Operations Hold Co Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 17 September 2020
    ...[2010] FCA 398; 269 ALR 76 Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Dorajay Pty Ltd v Aristocrat Leisure Limited [2005] FCA 588 F Hoffmann-La Roche AG v Chiron Corporation [2000] FCA 346; 171 ALR 295 Mayfield Development Corporation Pty Ltd v NSW Ports Operations Ho......
  • Darnell v Stonehealth Pty Ltd (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 15 April 2021
    ...be a practical factor to be weighed. (g) The same notion was expressed in Small (at 575) and Dorajay Pty Ltd v Aristocratic Leisure Ltd [2005] FCA 588 at [34] in requiring the existence of a legitimate forensic purpose for the production of (h) In Trade Practices Commission v Arnotts Ltd (N......
  • Get Started for Free