Dow Jones & Company Inc. v Gutnick

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeGleeson CJ,McHugh,Gummow,Hayne JJ,Gaudron J,Kirby J,Callinan J
Judgment Date10 Dec 2002
Neutral Citation2002-1210 HCA A,[2002] HCA 56
Docket NumberM3/2002
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
127 cases
  • Ward Group Pty Ltd v Brodie & Stone Plc
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Condoco Grand Cayman Resort Ltd v Broadhurst DaCosta
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court
    • 17 January 2005
    ...v. Bank of London & Montreal Ltd., [1979] 1 Q.B. 333; [1979] 1 All E.R. 561, referred to. (8) Dow Jones & Co. Inc. v. Gutnick, [2002] HCA 56; 194 A.L.R. 433, applied. (9) Electric Furnace Co. v. Selas Corp. of America, [1987] R.P.C. 23, applied. (10) Francome v. Mirror Group Newspap......
  • Parker v Commonwealth of Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Craig Wright v Roger Ver
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 31 July 2019
    ...medium. This emerges not least, but not only, from Lord Woolf's citation at [29] of the conclusion of the High Court of Australia in Gutnick v Dow Jones [2002] HCA 56 [192] that: ‘If a publisher publishes in a multiplicity of jurisdictions it should understand, and must accept, that it run......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
  • Does the EU General Data Protection Regulation have extra-territorial effect?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 25 November 2020
    ...(WD Pa 1997), South Dakota v Wayfair, Inc 585 US (2018), and in Australia by analogy Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575; 194 ALR 433; [2002] HCA 56; 2 Enn'ckl, Europaische Datenschutzgrundverordnung, Nomos-Verlag, 2 ed, Baden-Baden, 2018 (authors' own translation). The cont......
  • Does the EU General Data Protection Regulation have extra-territorial effect?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 17 November 2020
    ...(WD Pa 1997), South Dakota v Wayfair, Inc 585 US (2018), and in Australia by analogy Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575; 194 ALR 433; [2002] HCA 56; 2 Enn'ckl, Europaische Datenschutzgrundverordnung, Nomos-Verlag, 2 ed, Baden-Baden, 2018 (authors' own translation). The cont......
  • Defamation and the Internet: a New Paradigm?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 17 December 2002
    ...in Australia on the question of jurisdiction in cyberspace was the High Court decision in Dow Jones & Company Inc v Gutnick [2002] HCA 56. In early December, the High Court reaffirmed the earlier decision of the Supreme Court in the State of Victoria that a person in Victoria is entitle......
  • Print Media versus Online
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 6 October 2008
    ...the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth). Copyright Act ss 41, 41A, 42. See De Garis v Neville Jeffress Pidler Pty Limited (1990) 18 IPR 292. 210 CLR 575. The content of this article is intended to provide a guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific ci......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT