Dp v Commonwealth Central Authority

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGleeson CJ,Gaudron,Gummow,Hayne JJ,Kirby J,Callinan J
Judgment Date27 June 2001
Neutral Citation[2001] HCA 39,2001-0627 HCA A
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberD12/2000
Date27 June 2001
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
44 cases
  • Bdu v Bdt
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 15 May 2013
    ...[105].] Av Central Authority for New Zealand [1996] 2 NZLR 517 (refd) D, Re [2007] 1 AC 619 (refd) DP v Commonwealth Central Authority (2001) 206 CLR 401 (folld) E, Re [2012] 1 AC 144 (folld) El Sayed v Secretary for Justice [2003] 1 NZLR 349 (folld) H, Re [1998] AC 72 (refd) S, Re [2012] 2......
  • Re S (Child) (Abduction: Custody rights)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 3 July 2002
    ...see for example the judgment of Gleeson C.J. in DP v Commonwealth Central Authority; JLM v Director-General NSW Department of Communi [2001] HCA 39, paragraph 9:— "The discretion not to make an order for return only exists where there is a grave risk of harm (the gravity being emphasised by......
  • Re S (A Boy, Born on [A Date]) M v F and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 1 January 2022
  • E (Children) (FC)
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 10 June 2011
    ...than the interpretation, of article 13. We share the view expressed in the High Court of Australia in DP v Commonwealth Central Authority [2001] HCA 39, (2001) 206 CLR 401, paras 9, 44, that there is no need for the article to be "narrowly construed". By its very terms, it is of restricted ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Pleading and proving foreign law in Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 31 No. 2, August 2007
    • 1 August 2007
    ...(US, New York). (89) S and D [2005] FamCA 1035 (Unreported, Warnick J, 13 October 2005) (PRC); DP v Commonwealth Central Authority (2001) 206 CLR 401 (Greece); Hooshmand and Ghasmezadegan [2000] FLC [paragraph] 93-043 (Iran); Lo Surdo v Public Trustee [2003] NSWSC 837 (Unreported, Hamilton ......
  • Family Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...and distress. The circumstances in Art 13(b) refer to something more than this kind of result: see DP v Commonwealth Central Authority(2001) 180 ALR 402. There should be ‘grave risk of harm or other intolerability which must be measured as substantial, not trivial, and of a severity which i......
  • Human Rights in the High Court of Australia, 1976-2003: The Righting of Australian Law?
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 33-2, June 2005
    • 1 June 2005
    ...[No 2] (2001) 181 ALR 169 (Kirby J re: interpretation of s 21 of the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth)); DP v Commonwealth Central Authority (2001) 206 CLR 401 (Gummow, Hayne and Kirby JJ re: interpretation, in passing, of para 16(3)(d) of the Family Law (Child Abduction Convention) Regulations 19......
  • Will the child abduction treaty become more "Asian"? A first look at the efforts of Singapore and Japan to implement the Hague Convention.
    • United States
    • Denver Journal of International Law and Policy Vol. 42 No. 2-3, January - January 2014
    • 1 January 2014
    ...30. (citing DP v Commonwealth Central Authority (2001) 206 CLR 401 (Austl.); JLM v Director-General NSW Department of Community Services [2001] HCA 39 (176.) Id. [paragraph] [paragraph] 31-32 (citing A v Central Authority of New Zealand [1996] 2 NZLR 517 (CA)). (177.) Id. [paragraph] 33. (c......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT