DPP v Burns, Philip Thomas [TASCCA]

JurisdictionTasmania
JudgeEvans J,Porter J,Wood J
Judgment Date04 October 2012
Docket Number396/2012
Date04 October 2012
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeal

[2012] TASCCA 11

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA (COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL)

Evans, Porter and Wood JJ

396/2012

Director of Public Prosecutions
and
Burns, Philip Thomas
REPRESENTATION:
Counsel:

Appellant: J Ansell

R v McFarlane (1993) 2 Tas R 201 ; Braslin and Cowen v Tasmania [2010] TASCCA 1, referred to.

Aust Dig Criminal Law [3537]

Criminal Law — Appeal and new trial — Appeal against sentence — Appeals by Crown — Other matters — Sentence of 10 months' imprisonment together with a probation order for two convictions of aggravated armed robbery and a conviction of common assault — Whether sentence manifestly inadequate.

Orders of the Court:
  • 1 The appeal is allowed.

  • 2 The global sentence imposed on the respondent of 10 months' imprisonment together with a probation order to operate for 12 months following his release from prison are quashed.

  • 3 In lieu the respondent is sentenced to two and a half years' imprisonment to date from 18 March 2012 and it is ordered that he be eligible to apply for parole after serving one half of this sentence.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL

Evans J Porter J Wood J
1

Following the respondent's plea of guilty to two charges of aggravated armed robbery and a charge of common assault, Blow J sentenced him to a global sentence of 10 months' imprisonment with effect from 18 March 2012, and ordered that he be subject to a probation order to operate for 12 months following his release from prison. The Director of Public Prosecutions appeals against this sentence on the ground that it is manifestly inadequate.

2

When sentenced, the respondent was 24 years of age. He was 23 when he committed the offences.

3

The facts provided to the learned sentencing judge referrable to the respondent's criminal conduct included the following.

Common assault and aggravated armed robbery on 3 March 2012
4

At 3.35pm on Saturday 3 March 2012, the respondent and Jasmine Smith went to Woolworths Supermarket, at Glenorchy Central. When in the store they went to the meat section and placed seven packets of meat to the value of $171 into a bag. They then approached the front of the store. At this time Ms Smith was in possession of the bag containing the meat, and the respondent shielded her from an employee of the store, Jacinta Hall.

5

When Ms Hall went to follow Ms Smith, the respondent grabbed Ms Hall by the throat and arm, pulled her towards him and punched her to the chest. This conduct is the basis of his conviction for common assault.

6

The Assistant Store Manager, Darren Richards, and an employee, Matthew McHugo, approached the respondent and Ms Smith after they left the store. Thereupon the respondent pushed Mr McHugo and said ‘fuck off’. Mr Richards said to the respondent that he wanted to talk about the meat. The respondent ran at Mr Richards with both fists in the air. At this time the respondent was seen to be holding what was believed to be scissors towards Mr Richards. The respondent was, in fact, holding a paint scraper which he had stolen from the store. He had taken it from his pocket and placed it up his sleeve, so that only the tip of the scraper could be seen. He threatened Mr Richards not to come any closer or he would cut ‘them’. This conduct is the basis of his first conviction for aggravated armed robbery.

7

Ms Smith watched the incident unfold. She and the respondent left the area together.

Aggravated armed robbery on 17 March 2012
8

At approximately 5.18pm on Saturday, 17 March 2012, the respondent, Ms Smith and Todd Burns, the respondent's brother, entered Woolworths Supermarket in Sandy Bay. The respondent and Ms Smith went to the meat section of the store and Mr Todd Burns went to a separate section of the store. He apparently played no role in what then ensued.

9

The respondent and Ms Smith had a backpack in their possession. They placed a quantity of meat and gravy in the backpack. A customer notified an employee of the store, Mrigesh Khattri, of what the respondent and Ms Smith were doing. Mr Khattri went to the front counter to notify management. With the respondent carrying the backpack, he and Ms Smith attempted to walk through the store's express checkout without paying for the items in the backpack. Mr Khattri approached them. The respondent refused to stop and a struggle broke out. Mr Khattri attempted to place the respondent in a bear hug to restrain him. The backpack fell to the ground. The respondent took a knife from his trousers and held it downwards. It had a 10 to 12 cm blade. In the scuffle that then ensued Mr Khattri was stabbed two times to his upper right thigh. The respondent was wrestled to the floor. Ms Smith moved in and dragged the respondent away. He got to his feet and as he did so he waved the knife a number of times at staff.

10

Ms Smith collected the backpack and she and the respondent left the store. A member of the public used a row of trolleys to force them out of the door of the store. They left the area in a car.

Police interviews
11

On 18 March 2012, police interviewed the respondent in relation to the events of the previous day. He denied having entered the Woolworths Supermarket in Sandy Bay on the previous day and was adamant that he had been at home all the previous day. After viewing surveillance footage of what had occurred, he denied that it showed him, Ms Smith or his brother.

12

When interviewed by police on 24 March 2012 in relation to his conduct on 3 March 2012, the respondent said that on that occasion he had been alone and stoned off his head. He had stolen the meat in order to sell it and use the proceeds to purchase speed and dope.

Outstanding charges
13

His Honour was provided with the respondent's record of prior convictions, and the following table of outstanding charges to which the respondent had pleaded guilty and was due to be sentenced in the Court of Petty Sessions. (We have been told that for these offences the respondent ultimately received a sentence of six months' imprisonment, cumulative upon the sentence that is the subject of this appeal.)

Complaint

Date of Offence

Charge

Area of Offence

10360/11 (related to 1344/12)

8 th September 2011 9th September 2011

Stealing Use a computer to defraud Use a computer to defraud

Cygnet

10555/11 (related to 1344/12)

10 th September 2011

Use a computer with intent to defraud Use a computer with intent to defraud Use a computer with intent to defraud

Cygnet

10048/11

11 th September 2011

Assault a police officer Common assault Unlawfully carry a dangerous article in a public place Threaten a police officer

Sandy Bay

12266/11 (related to 1522/12)

6 th October 2011 28th October 2011

Common Assault Drive whilst not the holder of a driver licence Stealing

Woolworths — New Town Target — Hobart

11949/11

21 st October 2011

Stealing Stealing Stealing

Big W — Glenorchy Chickenfeed — Glenorchy Woolworths — Glenorchy

715/12

11 th November 2011

Stealing

Woolworths — Claremont

12824/11

15 th November 2011

Stealing

Big W — Kingston

12692/11

22 nd November 2011

Unlawful possession of property

Glenorchy

65/12

30 th November

Stealing Stealing Stealing

Target — Hobart, Woolworths — Rosny Big W — Rosny

12652/11

3 rd December

Contravene conditions of a notice

Woolworths — Huonville

1225/12

11 th December

Drive whilst not the holder of a driver licence Make off without payment

Brooker Highway — Hobart

1408/12

7 th January

Stealing

Tip Shop — South Hobart

1344/12 (related to 10360 & 10555)

2 nd February

Breach of bail

2644/12

7 th February 16 th February

Stealing Stealing

Woolworths — New Town, Target — Hobart

1522/12 (related to 12266/11)

7 th February

Breach of Bail

2867/2012

22 nd February 2012

Common Assault Destroy Property Trespass Trespass

Big W — Rosny

Injuries and victim impact statements
14

Jacinta Hall, the victim of the common assault, suffered bruises on her left arm and a sore swollen neck, which was tender and painful for around one week. Thereafter she recovered well. She was quite shaken up on the day and found it a bit scary to go to work for a few days, but soon got over it. She had trouble sleeping on the night of the incident. She did not take any time off work.

15

Darren Richards, the victim of the first charge of aggravated armed robbery, was quite frightened by what occurred and took three days off work.

16

Mrigesh Khattri, the victim of the second charge of aggravated armed robbery, suffered two stab wounds. He was taken to hospital but the wounds did not require stitches. The wounds were painful and...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex