DPP v Ka-Hung IP [ACTCA]
| Jurisdiction | Australian Capital Territory |
| Judge | Higgins CJ,Gray,Madgwick JJ |
| Judgment Date | 03 May 2005 |
| Court | Court of Appeal of ACT |
| Docket Number | No ACTCA 38 - 2004 |
| Date | 03 May 2005 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Matthew Valencic(Appellant) v Peter Jordan
...Cameron v The Queen [2002] HCA 6 [2002] HCA 6 ; 209 CLR 339 Craft v Diebert [2004] ACTCA 15 Director of Public Prosecutions v Ka-Hung Ip [2005] ACTCA 24 Ghoubriel v The Queen [2016] ACTCA 66 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 449 (1936) 55 CLR 449 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37 [2014] HCA 3......
-
JL v Director-General, Community Services Directorate
...VAJ (No 2) (1998) 197 CLR 172 Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472 Director of Public Prosecutions v Ip [2005] ACTCA 24 Fancourt v Mercantile Credits Ltd (1983) 154 CLR 87 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 G v G [1985] FLR 894 Goreski v de Costa [2014] ACTSC 233......
-
Richard Hambrook v Natalie Maylin Duke
...as Griffith v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 293 at 310, Everett v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 295 at 306, Director of Public Prosecutions v Ip [2005] ACTCA 24 at [38], R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212 at 212–213 and Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 at 340. 65. In brief, such appeals should......
-
Subasic v Williams
...(2010) 5 ACTLR 151 Craft v Diebert [2004] ACTCA 15 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 Director of Public Prosecutions v Ka-Hung Ip [2005] ACTCA 24 Grooms v Toohey [2012] ACTSC 28 ; 7 ACTLR 1 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Keen v Tither [2010] ACTSC 130 McEwan v Rohan (No 2) [2013] ......
Request a trial to view additional results