Dupas v The Queen

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeFrench CJ,Gummow,Hayne,Heydon,Crennan,Kiefel,Bell JJ.
Judgment Date15 April 2010
Neutral Citation2010-0616 HCA A,[2010] HCA 20
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberM20/2010
Date15 April 2010
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
74 cases
  • Hogan v Hinch
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 10 March 2011
    ...thereunder to act contrary to a requirement derived from Ch III that ‘all Federal and State Courts must be open to the public’. 86 In Dupas v The Queen117 the Court observed: ‘Having regard both to the antiquity of the power and its institutional importance, there is much to be said for the......
  • OKS v Western Australia
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 20 March 2019
    ...v The Queen (2000) 201 CLR 414 at 420 [13] per Gleeson CJ and Gummow J, 425 [31] per McHugh J; [2000] HCA 15 and Dupas v The Queen (2010) 241 CLR 237 at 248 [28]–[29]; [2010] HCA 19 OKS v Western Australia (2018) 52 WAR 482 at 509 [134]. 20 Weiss v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 300 at 317 [44]; ......
  • David Harold Eastman v DPP
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 22 August 2014
    ...170 applied Dickason v Dickason (1913) 17 CLR 50 applied Director of Public Prosecutions (Nauru) v Fowler (1984) 154 CLR 627 applied Dupas v The Queen (2010) 241 CLR 237 applied Dyers v The Queen (2002) 210 CLR 285 applied Eastman v ACT Executive Australian Capital Territory (2013) 274 FLR ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • What is a Stay Application in criminal cases?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 1 March 2022
    ...(Jago v The District Court of New South Wales and Ors [1989] HCA 46). With respect to prejudicial media publicity, Dupas v The Queen [2010] HCA 20 held that extensive pre-trial publicity is often common in cases involving 'heinous acts' and will not necessarily result in a stay being grante......
  • What is a Stay Application in criminal cases?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 1 March 2022
    ...(Jago v The District Court of New South Wales and Ors [1989] HCA 46). With respect to prejudicial media publicity, Dupas v The Queen [2010] HCA 20 held that extensive pre-trial publicity is often common in cases involving 'heinous acts' and will not necessarily result in a stay being grante......
8 books & journal articles
  • Indexes
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 18-4, October 2014
    • 1 October 2014
    .... . . . . . . 97Dudley vHM Advocate 1995SCCR 52 . . . . . . . . 10Dupas vR [2012] VSCA328 . . . . . . . . . . . . 331, 332Dupas vThe Queen [2010]HCA 20 . . . . . . . . . .354 THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOF 371TABLE OF CASESEccles, McPhillips and McShane v Ireland (Appli-catio......
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 15-4, October 2011
    • 1 October 2011
    .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118Dukes v Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (Duke IV) No.04-16688(9th Cir Apr 26,2010) . . . . . . . . . 118Dupas vR [2010] HCA20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84Ellis vR [2011] NZCA90 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267English v Emery Reimbold & Strick L......
  • The prisoners could not have that fair and impartial trial which justice demands': A fair criminal trial in 19th Century Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canterbury Law Review No. 25-2019, January 2019
    • 1 January 2019
    ...R v Stone [2001] EWCA Crim 297 at [48], [50]; R v Abu-Hamza [2007] QB 659 at 682, 685–686 per Lord Phillips CJ; and Dupas v The Queen (2010) 241 CLR 237 at [26]–[29]. 10 See, for example, Joseph Flynn “Prejudicial Publicity in Criminal Trials: Bringing Shepherd v Maxwell into the Nineties” ......
  • Judicial Management of Juror Impropriety
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 78-1, February 2014
    • 1 February 2014
    ...2000 (Vic), s. 78A. Cases of particular interest include: R v K [2003] NSWCCA 406; R v Bilal Skaf [2004] NSWCCA 37; Dupas v The Queen (2010) 241 CLR 237; Boyd v The State of Western Australia [2012] WASC 388. For a discussion of the relevant concerns and legislative response, see R. Johns, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT