Dyer v Chrysanthou (No 2) (Injunction)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | Federal Court |
| Judgment Date | 27 May 2021 |
| Neutral Citation | [2021] FCA 641 |
| Date | 27 May 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Porter v Australian Broadcasting Corporation
...Ltd [1984] 2 NSWLR 294 Dring v Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd [2019] UKSC 38; [2020] AC 629 Dyer v Chrysanthou (No 2) (Injunction) [2021] FCA 641 Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36; (2008) 235 CLR 125 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission [2010] HCA 21; (2010) 240 CLR 651 John Fairfax Group Pty Lt......
-
Monarch Advisory Group Pty Ltd v Puxty (No 2)
...test in the present case.38 The principles were also recently summarised by Thawley J in Dyer v Chrysanthou (No 2) (Injunction) [2021] FCA 641 (Dyer) at [74]-[78] in relation to misuse of confidential information and at [133]-[138] in relation to the administration of justice.consideration3......
-
Dyer v Chrysanthou (No 3) (Costs)
...v Westpac Securities Administration Ltd (2019) 272 FCR 170 Dyer v Chrysanthou [2021] FCA 578 Dyer v Chrysanthou (No 2) (Injunction) [2021] FCA 641 Gray v Richards (No 2) (2014) 315 ALR 1 Kisimul Holdings Pty Ltd v Clear Position Pty Ltd (No 2) (2014) 86 NSWLR 645 Lo v Australian Community P......
-
Porter v Dyer
...to those grounds as his account formed a basis of the judge’s findings at first instance in Dyer v Chrysanthou (No 2) (Injunction) [2021] FCA 641. 6 The grounds of appeal that I have referred to provide as follows: 1. The primary judge erred in allowing the First Respondent, (Dyer), to rely......