Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Australia | 1-800-335-6202

Eastman v R

Judgment Cited authorities 169 Cited in 141 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeGleeson CJ,Gaudron J,McHugh J,Gummow J,Kirby J,Hayne J,Callinan J
Judgment Date25 May 2000
Neutral Citation[2000] HCA 29,2000-0525 HCA B
Date25 May 2000
Docket NumberC5/1997
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
123 cases
16 books & journal articles
  • Mandatory sentencing for people smuggling: issues of law and policy.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 36 Nbr. 2, August 2012
    • 1 August 2012
    ...JA), [40] (Chesterman JA). (381) Ibid [38]. (382) See Tasmania v Commonwealth (1904) 1 CLR 329, 358-60 (O'Connor J); Eastman v The Queen (2000) 203 CLR 1, 41-2 [134] (McHugh J); Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v CDG Pty Ltd (2004) 216 CLR 515, 569 [150] (Kirby J); New South Wales v Comm......
  • The Race Power — Its Replacement and Interpretation
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 40-3, September 2012
    • 1 September 2012
    ...(2002) 76 Australian Law Journal 456. 6 Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd (1920) 28 CLR 129; Eastman v Queen (2000) 203 CLR 1, 47 [149] (McHugh J). Note, however, that textualism still involves reading the text and structure in its historic context. 7 See, eg, The......
  • Involuntary Detention and the Separation of Judicial Power
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 35-1, March 2007
    • 1 March 2007
    ...413 [247] (Kirby J); cf 424–5 [295] (Callinan J); Commonwealth v Yarmirr (2001) 208 CLR 1, 117–18 [262] (Kirby J); Eastman v The Queen (2000) 203 CLR 1, 46 [146]–[147], fn 175 (McHugh J); Byrnes v The Queen (1999) 199 CLR 1, 34 [80] (Kirby J); Corporate Affairs Commission (NSW) v Yuill (199......
  • Territory Courts and Federal Jurisdiction
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 33-1, March 2005
    • 1 March 2005
    ...with that argument is _____________________________________________________________________________________ 192 Eastman v The Queen (2000) 203 CLR 1, n 193. (Citation omitted.) 193 This legislation either applies the law in force from time to time in another State or territory, or continues......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT