Eastman v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFederal Court
Neutral Citation1997-0625 FCA A,2002-0703 FCA C
Date1997
Year1997

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
94 cases
  • Woodroffe v National Crime Authority
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • New Zealand v Johnston
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Eastman v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 25 May 2000
    ...and determination whether there was a question as to the appellant's fitness to plead at the time of the trial. 1Eastman v The Queen (1997) 76 FCR 9. 2Re Governor, Goulburn Correctional Centre; Ex parte Eastman (1999) 73 ALJR 1324 ; 165 ALR 171 . 3 (1989) 167 CLR 259 . 4 (1937) 57 CLR ......
  • Woods v Multi-Sport Holdings Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 7 March 2002
    ... ... 132 (1994) 182 CLR 211 ... 133 (1994) 182 CLR 211 at 264 ... 134 See Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 76 ALJR 1 at 73–74 [342]; 185 ALR 1 at 99–101 ... 135 Mickelberg v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 259 ; Eastman ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles