Eastman v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
Judgment Date2008
Neutral Citation[2008] FCAFC 62
Date2008
Year2008

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 cases
  • Revill v John Holland Group Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 8 November 2022
    ...FCA 655; (1991) 33 FCR 397 DJL v Central Authority [2000] HCA 17; (2000) CLR 226 Doherty v Murphy [1996] 2 VR 553 Eastman v The Queen [2008] FCAFC 62; (2008) 166 FCR 579 Fair Work Ombudsman v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1176; (2011) 198 FCR 174 Gerlach v Clifton Bricks Pty Ltd......
  • Commonwealth of Australia v Sanofi (formerly Sanofi-Aventis) (No 5)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 28 April 2020
    ...of Australia v Sanofi (formerly Sanofi-Aventis) [2017] FCA 382 Commonwealth v Sanofi (2015) 237 FCR 483 Eastman v The Queen (2008) 166 FCR 579 Elsinora Global Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2006) 155 FCR 413 European Bank Limited v Robb Evans of Robb Evans & Associates (2010) 240 CL......
  • Kevin O'Rafferty v The Queen
    • Australia
    • Court of Appeal of ACT
    • 19 December 2014
    ...[2014] HCA 10 Ainsworth v. Wilding [1896] 1 Ch. 673 Burrell v the Queen (2008) 238 CLR 218 DJL v Central Authority (2000) 201 CLR 226 Eastman v The Queen [2008] FCAFC 62 Elliott v The Queen (2007) 234 CLR 38 Grierson v The King (1938) 60 CLR 431 Hammond v Schofield, [1891] 1 Q.B. 453 Har......
  • Lewis v Australian Capital Territory (No 8)
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 14 August 2018
    ...Aid [2005] HCA 12 ; 223 CLR 1 Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions [2003] HCA 28 ; 214 CLR 318 Eastman v The Queen [2008] FCAFC 62 ; 166 FCR 579 Ex parte Hookey; In the matter of The Risca Coal and Iron Co (1862) 4 De G F & J 456 ; 45 ER 1261 Ezekiel-Hart v Law Society of the Australia......
  • Get Started for Free