Eatock v Bolt

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date2011
Neutral Citation2011-0928 FCA C,2011-1019 FCA D
Year2011
Date2011
CourtFederal Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • Smethurst v Commissioner of Police
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 15 April 2020
    ...and Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of Western Australia Inc (1999) 95 FCR 114 at 132–133 [45]–[49]; Eatock v Bolt (2011) 197 FCR 261 at 363 [455], 365–366 [465]–[468] read with Eatock v Bolt [No 2] (2011) 284 ALR 114 at 117–119 [14]–[23]. See also Moore v Canadian Newspapers Co......
  • McHugh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 7 April 2020
    ...Detention Centre at Port Headland (1993) 115 FLR 416 Dillon v R [1982] AC 484 Dixon v Lekich [2010] QCA 213; 56 MVR 70 Eatock v Bolt [2011] FCA 1103; 197 FCR 261 EFX17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 230; 374 ALR 272 Ex parte Walsh; In re Yates [1925] HCA 53; 3......
  • Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 15 June 2021
    ...South Australia [2003] FCAFC 286; 133 FCR 325 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Thomas [2016] VSCA 237; 315 FLR 31 Eatock v Bolt [2011] FCA 1103; 197 FCR 261 Ex parte Walsh and Johnson; In re Yates [1925] HCA 53; 37 CLR 36 Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Gayle [2019] NSWCA 172; 1......
  • Barngarla Determination Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC v District Council of Kimba
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 12 July 2019
    ...[2016] FCA 724 Croft on behalf of the Barngarla Native Title Claim Group v State of South Australia (No 3) [2018] FCA 552 Eatock v Bolt [2011] FCA 1103; (2011) 197 FCR 261 Gerhardy v Brown [1985] HCA 11; (1985) 159 CLR 70 Griffiths v Minister for Lands, Planning and Environment [2008] HCA 2......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Defamation as a weapon against systemic racism?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 24 October 2022
    ...Act') s 10A. 22 See Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27, [10]-[12]. 23 Hollier (n 19) 3.1.1. 24 Defamation Act s 3(c). 25 (2011) 197 FCR 261, 266 [27], [29]. 26 Eatock v Bolt (No 2) (2011) 284 ALR 114, [3]-[4]. 27 'NT Aboriginal Figure Admits Role in Tent Embassy Protest', AM (AB......
7 books & journal articles
  • Context and the Limits of Legal Reasoning: The ‘Victim Focus’ of Section 18c in Comparative Perspective
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 44-2, June 2016
    • 1 June 2016
    ...robust debate while preparing this paper. All views expressed are my own. All translations are also my own except where indicated. 1 (2011) 197 FCR 261 (‘Eatock’). 258 Federal Law Review Volume 44 _____________________________________________________________________________________ against ......
  • Balancing religious freedom and anti-discrimination: Christian Youth Camps Ltd. v. Cobaw Community Health Services Ltd.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 40 No. 2, January 2017
    • 1 January 2017
    ...(2014) 40 Monash University Law Review 413, 414. (11) Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) s 18C. (12) Ibid s 18D. (13) Eatock v Bolt (2011) 197 FCR 261, 311 [210] (Bromberg (14) See, eg, Racial and Religious Tolerance Act 2001 (Vic) s 8; Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld) s 124A(1); Anti-D......
  • The collective dimension of federal anti-discrimination proceedings in Australia
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Discrimination and the Law No. 18-1, March 2018
    • 1 March 2018
    ...Ek stein,2016) the vilification claim involving newspaper articles critical of a group of ‘fairskinned Aboriginal people’ (Eatock v Bolt [2011] FCA 1103). Ms Eatock brought thataction on her own behalf, and on behalf of people like her, who have fairer (rather thandarker) skin, and who (by ......
  • REGULATING CYBER-RACISM.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 41 No. 1, August - August 2017
    • 1 August 2017
    ...Post Pty Ltd (2001) 112 FCR 352, 356 [13]; AHRC, 'Cyber Racism and Community Resilience Project' (n 74) 6. See also Eatock v Bolt (2011) 197 FCR 261, 268, in which Bromberg J of the Federal Court concluded that the ordinary or reasonable hypothetical representative will have the characteris......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT