Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd v Delap Impex Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation2013-0617 FCA A
Date2013
Year2013
CourtFederal Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
7 cases
  • Sanum Investments Limited v ST Group Co., Ltd (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 4 July 2019
    ...of r 10.24 FCR which provides for substituted service. At [17], his Honour said: In Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd v Delap Impex Ltd [2013] FCA 600; (2013) 103 IPR 421, 432-433 [76], Katzmann J explained that service which is “not practicable” within the rule does not require an applicant......
  • Ford, in the matter of Careers Australia Group Ltd (in liq) v Mansfield
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 3 March 2022
    ...Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) v One Rail Australia (FLA) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2021] FCA 1183 Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd v Delap Impex Ltd [2013] FCA 600; 103 IPR 421 Fencott v Muller (1983) 152 CLR 570 Ford v Advanced Energy Minerals Ltd [2021] FCA 995 Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo......
  • Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Huang
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 16 September 2019
    ...of Taxation v Vasiliades (2014) 323 ALR 59; (2014) 99 ATR 799; [2014] FCA 1250 Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd v Delap Impex Ltd [2013] FCA 600 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Barnes Development Pty Ltd (2009) 178 FCR 352 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Futuris Corporation Ltd (2008)......
  • Bayles v Nationwide News Pty Limited
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 24 August 2020
    ...Crosby v Kelly (2012) 203 FCR 451 Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick (2002) 2010 CLR 575 Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd v Delap Imprex Ltd [2013] FCA 600; 103 IPR 421 Ho v Akai Pty Ltd (in liq) (2006) 247 FCR 205 Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (2015) 237 FCR 33 Radio 2UE Sydney......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Brand owners target parallel importers to protect brand intellectual property
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 19 November 2013
    ...Brand owners will be watching the progress of the case with interest. Footnotes Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd v Delap Impex Ltd [2013] FCA 600. Paul's Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Ltd [2012] FCAFC 130 That is because although the possibility that an injunction might not be enforce......