ENT19 v Minister for Home Affairs

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date26 November 2021
Neutral Citation[2021] FCAFC 217
Date26 November 2021
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
ENT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCAFC 217


Federal Court of Australia


ENT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCAFC 217

Appeal from:

ENT19 v Minister For Home Affairs [2020] FCCA 2653



File number:

NSD 1272 of 2020



Judgment of:

COLLIER, KATZMANN, WHEELAHAN JJ



Date of judgment:

26 November 2021



Catchwords:

MIGRATION — appeal from decision of the Federal Circuit Court to dismiss an application for judicial review of a decision to refuse to grant a Safe Haven Enterprise visa — where Minister not satisfied that the grant of the visa was in the national interest under cl 790.227 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) — where appellant convicted of, and sentenced for, a people smuggling offence but recognised as a refugee at risk of serious harm in his country of nationality and where appellant satisfied all other visa criteria and there was no evidence that he was entitled to enter and reside in a country other than his country of nationality, whether Minister did not consider the prospect of refoulement and the potential breach by Australia of its non-refoulement treaty obligations — whether, if so, the Minister was bound to do so — whether primary judge erred by making a finding of fact in the absence of evidence — whether Minister’s decision legally unreasonable because appellant not found to be a person whom the Minister considered a danger to Australia’s security within s 36(1C) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) or because it was made for the purpose of further punishing the appellant



Legislation:

Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 25D

Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 (Cth) s 4

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s144

Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5H, 5J, 35A, 36, 37A, 46A, 65(1), 195A, 197AB, 197C, 198(6), 496(1), 501(1)

Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Sch 2, cl 790.227



Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Opened for signature 10 December 1984. 1465 UNTS 85 art 3. (entered into force 26 June 1987)

Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. Opened for signature 28 July 1951. 189 UNTS 137 arts 33, 42(1). (entered into force 22 April 1954)

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Opened for signature 16 December 1966. 999 UNTS 171. (entered into force 23 March 1976)

Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. Opened for signature 31 January 1967. 606 UNTS 267. (entered into force 4 October 1967)

Explanatory Memorandum to the Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Bill 2014 (Cth)



Cases cited:

Acting Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v CWY20 [2021] FCAFC 195

Al-Kateb v Goodwin (2004) 219 CLR 562

BAL19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 2189; 168 ALD 276

Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 252 FCR 352

Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1992) 176 CLR 1

Commonwealth of Australia v AJL20 [2021] HCA 21; 95 ALJR 567; 391 ALR 562

Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission (2000) 199 CLR 135

CWY20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2020) 282 FCR 62

Djalic v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 139 FCR 292

Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26; 77 ALJR 1088; 197 ALR 389; 73 ALD 321

Graham v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 263 CLR 1

Hands v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 267 FCR 628

Hernandez v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 415

Jione v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 232 FCR 120

KDSP v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2020) 279 FCR 1

Lim v Minister for Immigration (1992) 176 CLR 1

Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24

Minister for Home Affairs v Omar (2019) 272 FCR 589

Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332

Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Nystrom (2006) 228 CLR 566

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Huynh (2004) 139 FCR 505

Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v BFW20 by his Litigation Representative BFW20A (2020) 279 FCR 475

Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v FAK19 [2021] FCAFC 153

MNLR v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migration Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 35

NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1

NBMZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 220 FCR 1

O’Sullivan v Farrer (1989) 168 CLR 210

Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal (2012) 246 CLR 379

Plaintiff S4/2014 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 253 CLR 219

Plaintiff S156/2013 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 254 CLR 28

Plaintiff S297/2013 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) (2015) 255 CLR 231

R v Mackellar; ex parte Ratu (1977) 137 CLR 461

Re Barbaro and Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1980) 3 ALD 1

Re Gungor and Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1980) 3 ALD 225

Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391

Re Sergi and Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 2 ALD 224

Re v Connell; Ex parte The Hetton Bellbird Collieries Ltd (1944) 69 CLR 407

Taulahi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 246 FCR 146

Tuncok v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 172

Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 263 FCR 531

Water Conservation and Irrigation Commission (NSW) v Browning (1947) 74 CLR 492



Division:

General Division



Registry:

New South Wales



National Practice Area:

Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights



Number of paragraphs:

154



Date of hearing:

29 April 2021



Counsel for the Appellant:

Dr J Donnelly



Solicitor for the Appellant:

Scott Calnan Lawyer



Counsel for the Respondent:

Ms R Francois



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Australian Government Solicitor



ORDERS


NSD 1272 of 2020

BETWEEN:

ENT19

Appellant


AND:

MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS

Respondent



order made by:

COLLIER, KATZMANN, WHEELAHAN JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

26 November 2021



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


  1. The appeal be allowed.

  2. The orders of the Federal Circuit Court dated 6 November 2020 be set aside and in lieu thereof it be ordered that:

    1. A writ of certiorari issue directed to the respondent quashing the decision of the respondent dated 13 May 2020.

    2. A writ of...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
9 cases
  • BNGP v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 14 July 2023
    ...[2005] HCA 64; (2005) 226 CLR 1 DCP16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 91 ENT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCAFC 217; (2021) 289 FCR 100 ENT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2023] HCA 18 Gattellaro v Westpac Banking Corporation [2004] HCA 6; (2004) 204 ALR......
  • CCU21 v Minister for Home Affairs
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 31 January 2022
    ...Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v CWY20 [2021] FCAFC 195; 395 ALR 57 and ENT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCAFC 217 distinguishable – no material MIGRATION – where ASA revoked by ASIO and Qualified Security Assessment issued (QSA) – where Minister relied upon......
  • BUG16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 4 April 2022
    ...129; 277 FCR 493 DYS16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 33; 260 FCR 260 ENT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCAFC 217 March v E & MH Stramare Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 12; 171 CLR 506 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; 162 CLR 24 Mi......
  • Nuon v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 6 June 2022
    ...for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v CWY20 [2021] FCAFC 195 and ENT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCAFC 217 – held: Minister under no obligation to consider national interest implications in the circumstances – where Minister alleged to have exer......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Refoulement
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Exclusion and Refoulement. Criminality in International and Domestic Refugee Law
    • 12 September 2023
    ...in Australia (2023) at 7.54, online: www.aat.gov.au/guide-to-refugee-law-in-australia, referring to ENT19 v Minister of Home Aȶairs , [2021] FCAFC 217 at para 122). As well, according to s 502 of the Migration Act 1958 , the minister responsible for immigration and refugee matters can issue......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Exclusion and Refoulement. Criminality in International and Domestic Refugee Law
    • 12 September 2023
    ...(Migration), [2019] AATA 4393 .........465 DOB18 v Minister for Home Afairs, [2019] FCAFC 63 ..........602, 619, 620, 621 ENT19 v MHA, [2021] FCAFC 217 ................................................................602 Feliciano Tamayo and Department of Immigration, [1994] AATA 384 .............