Environment Protection Authority v Caltex Refining Company Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date1993
Neutral Citation[1993] HCA 74,1993-1224 HCA A
Date1993
Year1993
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
96 cases
  • Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • C Plc v P (Attorney General intervening)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 Mayo 2007
    ... ... Ltd A Merrill Communications Company 190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG Tel No: 020 ... it was submitted that P lost the protection of the privilege. The judge did not accept this ... It is unnecessary to cite authority for the above propositions at any great length ... to pre-existing documents in Environment Protection Authority v Caltex Refining Co Pty Ltd ... ...
  • John Pfeiffer Pty Ltd v Rogerson
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 21 Junio 2000
    ...9 Covering cl 5. 10 Mabo v Queensland [No 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1 at 15; Environment Protection Authority v Caltex Refining Co Pty Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 477 at 556; Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520 at 566; Lipohar v The Queen (1999) 74 ALJR 282 at 289, 291, 316; 168 ......
  • Farm Transparency International Ltd v New South Wales
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 10 Agosto 2022
    ...195 (2001) 208 CLR 199. 196 (2001) 208 CLR 199 at 247–248 [104]. 197 Environment Protection Authority v Caltex Refining Co Pty Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 477 at 514; Northern Land Council v Quall (2020) 94 ALJR 904 at 921 [82]; 383 ALR 378 at 398. See also Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 198 M......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Corporations beware! The High Court delivers - Contempt 101
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 26 Junio 2015
    ...v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2004) 220 CLR 129 at 142 per Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Callinan and Heydon JJ. 13 (1993) 178 CLR 477 where the High Court held that "a corporation charged with an offence may not resist a lawful command to produce documents to a prosecuti......
  • The privilege against self-incrimination in regulatory investigations
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 20 Septiembre 2019
    ...209, [44]. 6 Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission (2013) 251 CLR 196. 7 Environment Protection Authority v Caltex Refining Co Pty Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 477, 503 (Mason CJ and Toohey 8 Environment Protection Authority v Caltex Refining Co Pty Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 477, 503 (Mason CJ and Toohey J......
14 books & journal articles
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 9-4, December 2005
    • 1 Diciembre 2005
    ...314 THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOFSUBJECT INDEXEnvironment Protection Authority v CaltexRefining Co. Pty Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 477,HC .................................................................... 1 99Esso Australia Resources Ltd v FCT (1999)201 CLR 49 ..........................
  • Legal Advice Privilege and the Corporate Client
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 9-3, July 2005
    • 1 Julio 2005
    ...See McHugh J’s comments to this effect in the Australian case of Environment ProtectionAuthority v Caltex Refining Co. Pty Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 477, HC, at 554 (in the context of theprivilege against self-incrimination) and Esso Australia Resources Ltd v FCT (1999) 201 CLR 49 at89, discussed ......
  • Self–Monitoring, Self–Policing, Self–Incrimination and Pollution Law
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 60-2, March 1997
    • 1 Marzo 1997
    ...privilege against self-incrimination147 ibid at 109–110, discussed in Environment Protection Authority vCaltex Refining Co Pty Ltd (1993)178 CLR 477, 492–493.148 Rio Tinto Zinc Corporation vWestinghouse Electric Corporation [1978] AC 547 (House of Lords);though a contrary view was expressed......
  • Territory Courts and Federal Jurisdiction
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 33-1, March 2005
    • 1 Marzo 2005
    ...306–7, 311 (Mason CJ and McHugh J), 316 (Brennan J), 327 (Deane J); Environment Protection Authority v Caltex Refining Co Pty Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 477, 508 (Mason CJ and Toohey J), 556 (McHugh J); Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd (1994) 179 CLR 520, 556 (Mason CJ, Deane, Dawson, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT