Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of Sa Inc.
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | Gaudron,McHugh,Hayne,Callinan JJ,Kirby J |
| Judgment Date | 07 March 2002 |
| Neutral Citation | 2002-0307 HCA A,[2002] HCA 8 |
| Court | High Court |
| Docket Number | A22/2001 |
| Date | 07 March 2002 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
188 cases
3 firm's commentaries
-
DP v Bird: is vicarious liability on the move in historical abuse proceedings?
...227 ALR 46; [2006] HCA 19; BC200603256 (Sweeney). 13 DP v Bird , [128] referring to Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc (2002) 209 CLR 95; 187 ALR 92; [2002] HCA 14 DP v Bird , [55] referring to Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc (2002) 209 CLR 95; 187 ALR 92; [2002......
-
Serving God and being an employee are not mutually exclusive
...muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn. And, The labourer is worthy of his reward." 3 Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc [2002] HCA 8; 209 CLR 4 See, for example, Steven Threadgill v Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane [2014] FWC 6277. The content of this arti......
-
God's Work or Fair Work?
...relationship has steadily changed. The critical case in this regard being Ermogenous v the Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc (2002) 209 CLR 95, where the High Court ruled quite emphatically that there was no presumption that a minister of religion was not an employee – it depends on all th......
3 books & journal articles
-
Contract formation
...151 Diploma Construction (WA) Pty Ltd v Best Bar Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] WASC 230. 152 Ermogeneous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc (2002) 209 CLR 95 at [25]; Quarante Pty Ltd v he Owners Strata Plan No 67212 [2008] NSWCA 258 at [86]–[87], per Sackville AJA. See also Specialist Insulation......
-
Contract and the family: whither intention?
...to be enforced: Popiw v Popiw [1959] VR 197; Merritt v Merritt [1970] 1 WLR 1211. (2) Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc (2002) 187 ALR 92, 100 (`Ermogenous'). The High Court suggested that presumptions of intention are of use only to indicate where the onus of proof (3) See, e......
-
Respecting the dignity of Religious Organisations: When is it appropriate for Courts to decide Religious Doctrine?
...Counsel for DEF also drew this Court’s attention to the decision in Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc (2002) 209 CLR 95; [2002] HCA 8 where Gaudron, McHugh, Hayne and Callinan JJ in a joint judgment (Kirby J agreeing) held that although the proposition that the relationship be......