Eunice Catherine Mary Ryan t/as Ryans Barristers and Solicitors(Appellant) v Georgia Vizovitis

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory
CourtCourt of Appeal of ACT
JudgeMurrell CJ,Penfold,Perry JJ
Judgment Date01 February 2017
Docket NumberFile Number: ACTCA 52 of 2014
Date01 February 2017

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
7 cases
  • Emile Brunoro(Appellant) v Selmar Nebelung (First Respondent)
    • Australia
    • Court of Appeal of ACT
    • 26 May 2017
    ...RailPro Services Pty Ltd v Flavel [2015] FCA 504; 242 FCR 424 Rinehart v Rinehart (No 3) [2016] FCA 539; 337 ALR 174 Ryan v Vizovitis [2017] ACTCA 3 Scuderi v Raskurasingham [2017] ACTSC 41 Schwartz v Hadid [2013] NSWCA 89 Selmes v Australian Capital Territory [2000] ACTSC 32 Sutherland Shi......
  • John Stanley Beagle(Appellant) v Australian Capital Territory and Southern New South Wales Rugby Union Ltd
    • Australia
    • Court of Appeal of ACT
    • 21 July 2017
    ...Ltd v Flavel [2015] FCA 504 ; 242 FCR 424 Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd [2001] HCA 68 ; 208 CLR 516 Ryan v Vizovitis [2017] ACTCA 3 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) [1999] HCA 3 ; 73 ALJR 306 Superyacht Technologies Pty Lt......
  • Stephen Raymond Dalton(Appellant) v David Pinkerton (First Respondent)
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 17 February 2017
    ...171 CLR 657 Ning v McGrath [2015] ACTSC 163 ; 71 MVR 376 RailPro Services Pty Ltd v Flavel [2015] FCA 504 ; 242 FCR 424 Ryan v Vizovitis [2017] ACTCA 3 Singh v Cooper [2016] ACTCA 55 ; 78 MVR 201 Warren v Coombes [1979] HCA 9 ; 142 CLR 531 Legislation Cited: Health and Other Services Compen......
  • Muench v McCue
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 10 September 2019
    ...[2004] NSWCCA 35 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1 Ryan v Vizovitis [2017] ACTCA 3 Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63; (2006) 228 CL......
  • Get Started for Free