Everard John Miller(Appellant) v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | French CJ,Kiefel,Bell,Nettle,Gordon JJ,Gageler J,Keane J |
| Judgment Date | 24 August 2016 |
| Neutral Citation | [2016] HCA 30 |
| Docket Number | A28/2015, A22/2015 & A17/2015 |
| Court | High Court |
| Date | 24 August 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1 firm's commentaries
-
Queensland Government Bulletin - 31 August 2016
...and Safety Regulations 2007 (Vic)" (the OHS Regulations) (24 August 2016). More... Casenote: Miller v R; Smith v R; Presley v DPP (SA) [2016] HCA 30: Extended Joint Criminal The High Court has allowed three appeals from a decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of Sout......
8 books & journal articles
-
Unlawfulness’s Doctrinal and Normative Irrelevance to Complicity Liability
...J. Baker, University of Surrey, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK; Wuhan University, Hubei 430072, China.Email: dennis.baker@surrey.ac.uk1. [2016] HCA 30.2. [2016] 2 WLR 681.The Journal of Criminal Law2017, Vol. 81(5) 393–416ªThe Author(s) 2017Reprints and permissions:sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.na......
-
Prosecuting Complicity
...LR 11. See also thejudgments (dissentiente) of Kirby J. in Clayton vThe Queen [2006] 81 ALJR 439 and of Gageler J. in Miller vThe Queen[2016] HCA 30.12. For an exception see Baker, above n. 5.13. In line with Sarch’s ‘endorsement theory’, Krebs argues that the mental element in complicity s......
-
A Normative Case for Abolishing the Doctrine of Extended Joint Criminal Enterprise
...Accessorial Liability”: Substantive Judicial Reform, not Common Law Housekeeping’ (2016) 75(3)Cambridge Law Journal 550, 578–9.12. [2016] HCA 30.13. Miller v The Queen [2016] HCA 30 at [4].14. [2016] HKEC 2715.15. HKSAR v Chan Kam-Shing [2016] HKEC 2715 at [33]–[40].16. Simester (n 11), 73.......
-
Joint Enterprise Liability: Recent Developments and Judicial Responses
...rea; second, it createdan anomalous disparity in the law between the accessory’s culpability and the principal’s.4. In Miller vThe Queen [2016] HCA 30; HKSAR vChan Kam Shing [2016] HKCFA 87, respectively.5. See AP Simester, ‘Accessory Liability and Common Unlawful Purpose’ (2017) 133 (Jan) ......
Request a trial to view additional results