F v R

JurisdictionSouth Australia
Date1983
Year1983
CourtSupreme Court of South Australia
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
25 cases
2 firm's commentaries
  • Right of parents to plan their reproductive future
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • January 29, 2016
    ...for a detailed discussion 5[1992] HCA 58 6These duties were discussed in Rogers v Whitaker [1992] HCA 58 at 483 and 490, and in F v R (1983) 33 SASR 189 at 192 7[2003] HCA 38 8[1992] HCA 58 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist ......
  • Failure to warn: Monument v Baker
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • November 18, 2011
    ...of care of a surgeon, the court relied on the established principles from Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479 as well as F v R (1983) 33 SASR 189. Those cases provide that a medical practitioner owes a duty to exercise reasonable care and skill in the provision of professional advice and t......
1 books & journal articles
  • Edwards v Blomeley; Harriton v Stephens; Waller v James: wrongful life actions in Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 26 No. 3, December 2002
    • December 1, 2002
    ...and Kirby JJ). (75) [2000] 2 AC 59; see the discussion above Part III(A). (76) See, eg, F v R (1982) 29 SASR 437 (Mohr J); aff'd (1983) 33 SASR 189; Petrunic v Barnes [1988] Aust Torts Reports [paragraph] 80-147; Bannerman v Mills [1991] Aust Torts Reports [paragraph] 81-079; Kambouroglou v......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT