Fai Insurances Ltd v Winneke

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1982] HCA 26,1982-0511 HCA D
Date1982
Year1982
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
129 cases
3 firm's commentaries
  • Inside Track: Property & Real Estate - In the media, In practice and courts, Cases and Legislation
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 15 June 2020
    ...274 and Acquista Investments Pty Ltd v Urban Renewal Authority (2015) 123 SASR 147 referred to and applied, FAI Insurances Ltd v Winneke [1982] HCA 26; (1982) 151 CLR 342 distinguished - no other reason for keeping proceeding on foot - application for discovery and the administration of int......
  • Construction & Infrastructure - What's News - 22 May 2013
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 3 June 2013
    ...proposal to cancel licence. Benz v Queensland Building Services Authority [2010] QCAT 625, applied FAI Insurances Ltd v Winneke (1981) 151 CLR 342, cited Papallo v Queensland Building Services Authority [2012] QCAT 59, applied Vadasz v Queensland Building Services Authority [2013] QCAT 84, ......
  • Victorian Government Bulletin - In the media, In practice and courts, Cases and Legislation
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 2 July 2020
    ...274 and Acquista Investments Pty Ltd v Urban Renewal Authority (2015) 123 SASR 147 referred to and applied, FAI Insurances Ltd v Winneke [1982] HCA 26; (1982) 151 CLR 342 distinguished - No other reason for keeping proceeding on foot - application for discovery and the administration of int......
19 books & journal articles
  • Judicial Review of Non-Statutory Executive Powers
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 31-3, September 2003
    • 1 September 2003
    ...51 Ibid [38]. 52 Ibid. 53 Cf R v Toohey (1981) 151 CLR 170; FAI Insurances Ltd v Winneke (1982) 151 CLR 342. 54 [2002] EWCA Civ 03 (25 January 2002), [40]. 55 See Barton v The Queen (1980) 147 CLR 75. 56 See, eg, De Freitas v Benny [1976] AC 239; Reckley v Minister of Public Safety and Info......
  • Termination of Appointments to Public Offices
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 24-1, March 1996
    • 1 March 1996
    ...natural"166167168169170171172173(1985) 59 ALR 699.AirForce Regulations 1927,reg628(1).(1985) 59 ALR 699at700.Ibidat715.Ibidat716.Ibid.(1982) 151 CLR 342.Ibidat349-50perGibbsCJ,355-6perStephenJ,366and371perMasonJ,383perAickinJ,and400-1perWilsonJ. 1996TerminationofAppointmentstoPublicOffices2......
  • Of Kings and Officers — The Judicial Development of Public Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 33-2, June 2005
    • 1 June 2005
    ...n 145, 86 ff. 241 (1907) 4 CLR 1497. 242 Ibid 1512–13. 243 M v Home Office [1994] 1 AC 377, 416–17. 244 FAI Insurances Ltd v Winneke (1982) 151 CLR 342, 351, 372, 386–7, 404, 419–21; Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission (2000) 199 CLR 135, 145–6. However, o......
  • Democracy, Liberty and the Prerogative: The Displacement of Inherent Executive Power by Statute
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 41-2, June 2013
    • 1 June 2013
    ...137 CLR 396, 403; Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1977) 139 CLR 54, 87; FAI Insuranc es Ltd v Winneke (1982) 151 CLR 342; Egan v Willis (1998) 195 CLR 424. 37 Seas and Submerged Lands Case (1975) 135 CLR 337, 364–5. 38 J E Richardson, 'The Executive Power of......
  • Get Started for Free