Fair Work Ombudsman v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (the Hutchison Ports Appeal)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date02 May 2019
Neutral Citation[2019] FCAFC 69
Date02 May 2019
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
Fair Work Ombudsman v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (the Hutchison Ports Appeal) [2019] FCAFC 69


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Fair Work Ombudsman v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (the Hutchison Ports Appeal) [2019] FCAFC 69


Appeal from:

Fair Work Ombudsman v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2018] FCA 934



File number:

NSD 1248 of 2018



Judges:

FLICK, ROSS AND RANGIAH JJ



Date of judgment:

2 May 2019



Catchwords:

INDUSTRIAL LAW – appeal from a single judge of the Federal Court – civil remedy provision – pecuniary penalties – meaning of s 557(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – course of conduct principle – appeal upheld



Legislation:

Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 15AA

Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 (Cth) s 119(1A)

Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (Cth) s 79

Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 40A, 417, 539, 546, 556, 557, Pt 4-1

Industrial Relations Act 1988 (Cth) s 178

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ss 494, 719



Cases cited:

Accident Insurance Mutual Ltd v Sullivan (1986) 7 NSWLR 65

Accident Towing & Advisory Committee v Combined Motor Industries Pty Ltd [1987] VR 529

Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (Northern Territory) (2009) 239 CLR 27

Australian Building and Construction Commission v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (The Kane Constructions Case) [2017] FCA 168

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2018] HCA 3; (2018) 351 ALR 190

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Nine Brisbane Sites Appeal) [2019] FCAFC 59

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCAFC 53; (2017) 249 FCR 458 (Perth International Airport Case)

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (Queensland Children’s Hospital case) (2017) 271 IR 321

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (the Nine Brisbane Sites Appeal) [2019] FCAFC 59

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Pauls [2017] FCA 843

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) v Yazaki Corporation [2018] FCAFC 73; (2018) 357 ALR 55

Australian Licenced Aircraft Engineers Association v International Aviation Service Assistance Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 333; (2011) 193 FCR 526

Australian Mines and Metals Association Inc v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2018] FCAFC 223

Cahill v Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union (No 2) (2008) 170 FCR 357

Chevron Australia Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (No 2) [2016] FCA 768

Chief Executive Officer of Customs v Adelaide Brighton Cement Ltd (2004) 139 FCR 147

CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd (1997) 187 CLR 384

Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Industrial Relations Commission (2000) 203 CLR 194

Coleman v Power (2004) 220 CLR 1

Commonwealth v Anti-Discrimination Tribunal (Tasmania) (2008) 169 FCR 85

Commonwealth v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; (2015) 258 CLR 482

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v QR Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 652

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill (2010) 269 ALR 1

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Hail Creek Coal Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 727

Dix v Crimes Compensation Tribunal [1993] 1 VR 297

DP World Sydney Limited v Maritime Union of Australia (No 2) [2014] FCA 596

Fair Work Ombudsman v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2018] FCA 934

Fair Work Ombudsman v Grouped Property Services Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCA 557

Fair Work Ombudsman v Lohr (2018) 356 ALR 424

Fair Work Ombudsman v Maritime Union of Australia [2012] FCA 1232

Fair Work Ombudsman v Maritime Union of Australia [2017] FCA 1363

Fair Work Ombudsman v South Jin Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 832

Flavel v RailPro Services Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCCA 1449

Gardner v Jay (1885) 29 ChD 50

House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499

IW Applicant v The City of Perth (1997) 191 CLR 1

JJ Richards & Sons Pty Ltd v Fair Work Australia (2012) 201 FCR 297

JJ Richards & Sons Pty Ltd v Fair Work Australia [2012] FCAFC 53

Kennewell v MG & CG Atkins T/as Cardinia Waste & Recyclers [2015] FCA 716

Khoury v Government Insurance Office (NSW) (1984) 165 CLR 622

Maritime Union of Australia v Fair Work Ombudsman and Skilled Offshore (Australia) Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 120

Mills v Meeking (1990) 169 CLR 214

Nilant v Macchia (2000) 104 FCR 238

Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; (1998) 193 CLR 72

Potter v Minahan (1908) 7 CLR 277

Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355

Qantas Airways Ltd v Transport Workers' Union of Australia (No 2) [2011] FCA 816

R v L (1994) 49 FCR 534

Richards & Sons Pty Ltd v Fair Work Australia [2012] FCAFC 53

Rocky Holdings Pty Limited v Fair Work Ombudsman (2014) 221 FCR 153

Royer v Western Australia [2009] WASCA 139

Secretary, Department of Social Security v Knight (1996) 72 FCR 115

Shizas v Commissioner of Police ([2017] FCA 61

SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (SZTAL) [2017] HCA 34

Thompson v Gould & Co [1910] AC 409

Tomlinson v Ramsay Food Processing Pty Limited (2015) 256 CLR 507

Transport Workers’ Union of Australia v Registered Organisations Commissioner [No 2] [2018] FCAFC 203; 363 ALR 464

Waugh v Kippen (1986) 160 CLR 156



Date of hearing:

14 November 2018



Registry:

New South Wales



Division:

Fair Work Division



National Practice Area:

Employment & Industrial Relations



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

193



Counsel for the Appellant:

Mr J Bourke QC with Mr M Seck



Solicitor for the Appellant:

Fair Work Ombudsman



Counsel for the Respondent:

Mr B Walker SC with Mr T Slevin



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Slater and Gordon



ORDERS


NSD 1248 of 2018

BETWEEN:

FAIR WORK OMBUDSMAN

Appellant


AND:

CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MARITIME, MINING AND ENERGY UNION

Respondent



JUDGES:

FLICK, ROSS AND RANGIAH JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

2 MAY 2019



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


1. The appeal is allowed.

2. The orders of the primary judge are set aside.

3. The matter is remitted to the primary judge to determine the issue of penalty.







Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.




REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

FLICK J:

1 In November 2017, the primary Judge published her reasons for concluding that the former Maritime Union of Australia (“MUA”) contravened s 417 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth): Fair Work Ombudsman v Maritime Union of Australia [2017] FCA 1363. In June 2018, her Honour published reasons for imposing penalties and for not ordering compensation: Fair Work Ombudsman v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2018] FCA 934.

2 The Fair Work Ombudsman now appeals. An Amended Notice of Appeal set forth nine Grounds of...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
14 cases
  • James Cook University v Ridd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 22 July 2020
    ...[1930] HCA 12; 43 CLR 472 Fair Work Ombudsman v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (the Hutchison Ports Appeal) [2019] FCAFC 69 Geo A Bond and Co Ltd (in liq) v McKenzie [1929] AR 499 George A Bond & Co Ltd (in liq) v McKenzie [1929] AR(NSW) 498 Hancock Prospecting Pt......
  • Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Ingham (The 180 Brisbane Construction Case) (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 23 March 2021
    ...(emphasis added) (see also Fair Work Ombudsman v Construction, Forestry, Mining, Maritime and Energy Union (The Hutchinson Ports Appeal) [2019] FCAFC 69 at [181] per Rangiah The applicant submitted that common law course of conduct principles are not relevant to Mr Griffin’s contraventions ......
  • Roohizadegan v TechnologyOne Limited (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 2 October 2020
    ...Orthodox Community of SA Inc [2002] HCA 8; 209 CLR 95 Fair Work Ombudsman v Construction, Forestry, Maritime Mining and Energy Union [2019] FCAFC 69 Kaur v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 53; 269 FCR 464 General Motors-Holden’s Pty Ltd v Bowling (1976) 12 ALR 605......
  • Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The College Crescent Case)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 5 June 2020
    ...Buss JA dissenting). 107 In Fair Work Ombudsman v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (the Hutchison Ports Appeal) [2019] FCAFC 69, Rangiah J (with whom Ross J agreed in the result, Flick J dissenting) made the following observations about the “course of conduct” princ......
  • Get Started for Free