Fairbairn v Radecki

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeKiefel CJ,Gageler,Keane,Gordon,Edelman,Steward,Gleeson JJ.
Judgment Date11 May 2022
Neutral Citation[2022] HCA 18
Docket NumberS179/2021
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1 cases
  • Wan v BT Funds Management Limited
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 29 Noviembre 2022
    ...280; [1993] FCA 456 Drury v Smith [2012] NSWSC 1067 Edwards v Postsuper Pty Ltd [2007] FCAFC 83 Fairbairn v Radecki (2022) 400 ALR 613; [2022] HCA 18 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611; [2010] HCA 16 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Gungor (1982......
1 firm's commentaries
  • How does the Court determine the breakdown of a de-facto relationship?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 18 Julio 2022
    ...relationship breakdowns and property settlements. This was made evident in the recent High Court decision of Fairbairn v Radecki [2022] HCA 18 (11 May If you are no longer living with your spouse or partner, does that mean you are no longer in a de facto relationship with them? For a court ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT