Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International B.V. (No 6)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | Federal Court |
| Judge | STEWART J |
| Judgment Date | 07 March 2019 |
| Neutral Citation | [2019] FCA 337 |
| Date | 07 March 2019 |
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International B.V. (No 6) [2019] FCA 337
|
File number: |
NSD 1816 of 2004 |
|
|
|
|
Judge: |
STEWART J |
|
|
|
|
Date of judgment: |
7 March 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Date of publication of reasons: |
12 March 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Catchwords: |
PRIVILEGE – application for production of unredacted documents – whether cross-claimants waived legal professional privilege over redacted portions of documents produced under notices to produce – where entire documents would otherwise attract legal professional privilege
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for suppression and non-publication order – whether order necessary for proper administration of justice – where order sought over portions of documents originally redacted on claim of legal professional privilege – where order originally sought on interim basis |
|
|
|
|
Legislation: |
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AE, 37AF, 37AG, 37AI |
|
|
|
|
Cases cited: |
Attorney-General (NT) v Maurice [1986] HCA 80; 161 CLR 475 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cascade Coal Pty Ltd (No 1) [2015] FCA 607; 331 ALR 68 Bailey v Director-General, Department of Land and Water Conservation [2009] NSWCA 100; 74 NSWLR 333 British American Tobacco Australia Ltd v Secretary, Department of Health and Ageing [2011] FCAFC 107; 195 FCR 123 Commissioner of Taxation v Rio Tinto Ltd [2006] FCAFC 86; 151 FCR 341 DSE (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Intertan Inc [2003] FCA 384; 127 FCR 499 Esso Australia Resources Limited v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) [1999] HCA 67; 201 CLR 49 Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International B.V. (No 4) [2017] FCA 1345 Guy v Crown Melbourne Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 36; 355 ALR 420 Hastie Group Ltd (in liq) v Moore [2016] NSWCA 305; 339 ALR 635 Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36; 235 CLR 125 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission [2010] HCA 21; 240 CLR 651 Mann v Carnell [1999] HCA 66; 201 CLR 1 Osland v Secretary, Department of Justice [2008] HCA 37; 234 CLR 275 |
|
|
|
|
Date of hearing: |
6 March 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Registry: |
|
|
|
|
|
Division: |
|
|
|
|
|
National Practice Area: |
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-area: |
|
|
|
|
|
Category: |
Catchwords |
|
|
|
|
Number of paragraphs: |
86 |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Applicant / Cross-Respondent: |
D B Larish |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Applicant / Cross-Respondent: |
King & Wood Mallesons |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Respondents / Cross-Claimants: |
C Cochrane |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Respondents / Cross-Claimants: |
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan |
ORDERS
|
|
NSD 1816 of 2004 |
|
|
|
||
|
between: |
FEDERAL TREASURY ENTERPRISE (FKP) SOJUZPLODOIMPORT First Cross-Claimant
FEDERAL PUBLIC UNITARY ENTERPRISE EXTERNAL ECONOMIC UNION SOJUZPLODOIMPORT (FGUP VO) Second Cross-Claimant
|
|
|
AND: |
SPIRITS INTERNATIONAL B.V. (REGISTERED IN THE NETHERLANDS) Cross-Respondent
|
|
|
|
||
|
IN THE INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION: |
||
|
BETWEEN: |
SPIRITS INTERNATIONAL B.V. (REGISTERED IN THE NETHERLANDS) Applicant
|
|
|
AND: |
FEDERAL TREASURY ENTERPRISE (FKP) SOJUZPLODOIMPORT First Respondent
FEDERAL PUBLIC UNITARY ENTERPRISE EXTERNAL ECONOMIC UNION SOJUZPLODOIMPORT (FGUP VO) Second Respondent
|
|
|
JUDGE: |
STEWART J |
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
7 MARCH 2019 |
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
-
Subject to order 3 below, the Cross-Claimants produce to the Cross-Respondent the following documents forthwith:
-
An unredacted copy of the Joint Opinion dated 8 November 2017 referred to in paragraph 20 of the affidavit of Ms Semenova dated 14 February 2019 (“Affidavit”) (annexure G);
-
An unredacted copy of the email dated 24 April 2017 from Ms Semenova to Agility Legal Pty Ltd (“Agility Legal”) referred to in paragraph 21(c) of the Affidavit, together with unredacted copies of the emails in that string (annexure H);
-
An unredacted copy of the Advice on Prospects dated 11 December 2017 referred to in paragraph 23 of the Affidavit (annexure I);
-
An unredacted copy of the letter dated 12 January 2019 from Agility Legal to Ms Semenova referred to in paragraph 24 of the Affidavit (annexure J);
-
An unredacted copy of the letter dated 23 March 2018 from Agility Legal to Ms Semenova referred to in paragraph 24 of the Affidavit (“23 March Letter”) (annexure K);
-
An unredacted copy of the email dated 20 February 2018 from Agility Legal to Ms Semenova and an unredacted copy of the email dated 13 March 2018 from Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport (“FKP”) to Agility Legal (annexure L);
-
Save that the redactions of the heading immediately preceding paragraph 13 and paragraphs 13 to 16 may be retained, an unredacted copy of the email dated 13 July 2018 from Agility Legal to Ms Semenova referred to in paragraph 25 of the Affidavit (annexure M);
-
An unredacted copy of the letter dated 27 July 2018 from Agility Legal to Ms Semenova referred to in paragraph 28 of the Affidavit (“27 July Letter”), together with unredacted copies of all attachments (annexure N);
-
An unredacted copy of the the email from Mr Sokolov to Agility dated 27 April 2018 produced under the Second Notice to Produce (an email within tab 11);
-
An unredacted copy of the email dated 22 November 2018 from Agility Legal to FKP produced under the Second Notice to Produce, together with unredacted copies of emails in that string (tab 12); and
-
An unredacted copy of the email dated 26 November 2018 from FKP to Agility Legal under the Second Notice to Produce, together with unredacted copies of emails in that string (tab 21).
-
-
Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the interlocutory application filed on 1 March 2019 otherwise be dismissed.
-
Pursuant to ss 37AF and 37AI of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), the documents referred to in order 1 shall be kept confidential and shall not be published or disclosed until 7 March 2019 at 4.00 pm or further order on the ground that it is necessary to prevent prejudice to the administration of justice, save that access to the documents be granted forthwith under order 1 to the Cross-Respondent’s Australian solicitors and counsel.
-
The matter be listed on 7 March 2019 at 2.00 pm to reconsider the interim confidentiality order in order 3 and to hear submissions on costs.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
ORDERS
|
|
NSD 1816 of 2004 |
|
|
|
||
|
between: |
FEDERAL TREASURY ENTERPRISE (FKP) SOJUZPLODOIMPORT First Cross-Claimant
FEDERAL PUBLIC UNITARY ENTERPRISE EXTERNAL ECONOMIC UNION SOJUZPLODOIMPORT (FGUP VO) Second Cross-Claimant
|
|
|
AND: |
SPIRITS INTERNATIONAL B.V. (REGISTERED IN THE NETHERLANDS) Cross-Respondent
|
|
|
JUDGE: |
STEWART J |
|
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
7 MARCH 2019 |
|
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
-
The interim confidentiality order in order 3 of the orders made on 7 March 2019 at 9.15 am be discharged.
-
The Cross-Claimants pay the costs of the interlocutory application filed on 1 March 2019.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Ltd
...Services Ltd [1996] HCA 34; (1996) 186 CLR 404 Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International B.V. (No 6) [2019] FCA 337; (2019) 369 ALR 267 Glencore International AG v Commissioner of Taxation [2019] HCA 26; (2019) 265 CLR 646 Goldberg v Ng [1995] HCA 39; (1995)......
-
TerraCom Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission
...Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 46; 250 CLR 303 Federal Treasury Enterprise v Spirits International (No 6) [2019] FCA 337; 369 ALR 267 Grant v Downs [1976] HCA 63; 135 CLR 674 Hancock v Rinehart (Privilege) [2016] NSWSC 12 Legal Services Commission v JHW [2012] SASCFC ......
-
Vitruvian Investments Pty Ltd v Sharif
...Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 46; (2013) 250 CLR 303 Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International B.V. (No 6) [2019] FCA 337 Liquorland (Australia) Pty Ltd v Anghie [2003] VSC 73; (2003) 7 VR 27 Macquarie Bank Limited v Arup Pty Limited [2016] FCAFC 117 Mann v Carnell [19......
-
TerraCom Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission
...481‑2 per Gibbs CJ, 488 per Mason and Brennan JJ and 497‑8 per Dawson J. See Federal Treasury Enterprise v Spirits International (No 6) [2019] FCA 337; 369 ALR 267 at [15]‑[19]. In Federal Treasury at [25], which was adopted in Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Citigroup Global......