Fish v Solution 6 Holdings Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGleeson CJ,Gummow,Hayne,Callinan,Crennan JJ,Kirby J,Heydon J
Judgment Date18 May 2006
Neutral Citation[2006] HCA 22,2006-0518 HCA B
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberS206/2005
Date18 May 2006
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
41 cases
  • Batterham v Qsr Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 18 May 2006
    ...of the privative provision was argued. The appeal by Mr Batterham and Maylord was heard at the same time as the appeals in Fish v Solution 6 Holdings Ltd4 and Old UGC, Inc v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session 5. 13 The relevant provisions of the Act , and ......
  • Old Ugc Inc. v Industrial Relations Commission of Nsw in Court Session
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 18 May 2006
    ...If it be correct, then the case does not appear to me to give rise to a jurisdictional difficulty of the kind identified in Fish v Solution 6 Holdings Ltd2 and Batterham v QSR Ltd3. Mr McRann's incentive entitlements were as much a part of the remuneration for which he worked in the Austral......
  • Mansfield v Dpp (Wa)
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 20 July 2006
    ...at 559–561 (Full Court). 8Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (1996) 189 CLR 51 at 111, 141–142; Fish v Solution 6 Holdings Ltd [2006] HCA 22 at 9 s 7(1)(b). 10 Jurisdiction, qualified by subject-matter and amounts in issue, is conferred by s 101 of the Act also upon the District ......
  • Berowra Holdings Pty Ltd v Gordon
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 15 June 2006
    ...Gaudron JJ in Breavington v Godleman (1988) 169 CLR 41 at 87. 25 (2003) 211 CLR 476 at 505 [72]. See also Fish v Solution 6 Holdings Ltd [2006] HCA 22 at [33] per Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Callinan and Crennan 26 (1938) 59 CLR 369 at 391 (with whom Evatt and McTiernan JJ agreed). 27 [1987]......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Federal Constitutional Influences on State Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 39-3, September 2011
    • 1 September 2011
    ...clear terms or would be interpreted narrowly. See, eg, BHP Ltd v Dagi [1996] 2 VR 117, 193 (Hayne JA); Fish v Solution 6 Holdings Ltd (2006) 225 CLR 180, 194 [33] (Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Callinan and Crennan JJ). Such statements implicitly accept the existence of a power of State parlia......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT