Fortescue Metals Group v Warrie on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date18 October 2019
Neutral Citation[2019] FCAFC 177
Date18 October 2019
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health USA Inc. v Intervet International B.V. [2020] FCA 1333


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Fortescue Metals Group v Warrie on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People [2019] FCAFC 177

Appeal from:

Warrie (formerly TJ) (on behalf of the Yindjibarni People) v State of Western Australia [2017] FCA 803

Warrie (formerly TJ) (on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People) v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2017] FCA 1299



File number:

WAD 611 of 2017



Judges:

JAGOT, ROBERTSON, GRIFFITHS, MORTIMER AND WHITE JJ



Date of judgment:

18 October 2019



Catchwords:

NATIVE TITLE – abuse of process – potential inconsistency between determinations of native title – where primary judge recognised exclusive native title rights and interests held by claim group over area comprising part of Yindjibarndi country – where earlier determination in Moses v Western Australia [2007] FCAFC 78; (2007) 160 FCR 148 recognised only non-exclusive native title rights and interests over another part of Yindjibarndi country – s 13 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (NTA) – no abuse of process


NATIVE TITLE – determination of exclusive native title rights – whether primary judge erred in relying on findings concerning adverse spiritual consequences for strangers entering onto the claim area without permission supported a determination of exclusive native title rights – whether the primary judge was correct to find that the Yindjibarndi had continued to observe the traditional law and custom concerning permission to enter country from sovereignty to the present day – whether Griffiths v Northern Territory [2007] FCAFC 178; 165 FCR 391 and Banjima People v Western Australia [2015] FCAFC 84; 231 FCR 456 were correctly decided


NATIVE TITLE – the meaning of “occupy” in s 46B(1)(c) of the NTA – whether the primary judge erred in finding that at least one or more members of the claim group occupied two parts of the claim area at the time the application for determination of native title was lodged – appeal dismissed, with costs



Legislation:

Federal Court of Australia Act 1975 (Cth) ss 21 and 37M

Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 3, 4, 10, 11, 13, 81, 86, 47A, 47B, 61, 86, 207A, 221, 223 and 225

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 39.05

Native Title (Prescribed Bodies Corporate) Regulations 1999 (Cth)

Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983 (NSW) s 36

Iron Ore (Mount Goldsworthy) Agreement Act 1964 (WA) s 4



Cases cited:

AB v Western Australia (No 4) [2012] FCA 1268; 300 ALR 193

AEK15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 131; 244 FCR 328

Arnold v National Westminster Bank PLC [1991] 2 AC 93; 3 All ER 41

Ashraf v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 50

Attorney-General v Helicopter-Tjungarrayi (Ngurra Kayanta & Ngurra Kayanta #2) [2018] FCAFC 35; 359 ALR 256

Banjima People v State of Western Australia [2015] FCAFC 84; 231 FCR 456

Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority (NSW) [2006] HCA 27; 226 CLR 256

BHP Billiton Nickel West Pty Ltd v KN (Deceased) [2018] FCAFC 8; 258 FCR 521

Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1833; 117 FCR 424

Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Limited [2006] HCA 41; 229 CLR 386

Coffey v Secretary, Department of Social Security [1999] FCA 375; 86 FCR 434

Commissioner of Land Tax v Christie [1973] 2 NSWLR 526

Commonwealth v Yarmirr [2001] HCA 56; 208 CLR 1

Council of the City of Newcastle v Royal Newcastle Hospital (1957) 96 CLR 493

Council of the City of Newcastle v Royal Newcastle Hospital (1959) 100 CLR 1; [1959] AC 248

D’Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid [2005] HCA 12; 223 CLR 1

Dale v Western Australia [2011] FCAFC 46; 191 FCR 521

Daniel v State of Western Australia [2003] FCA 666

Daniel v State of Western Australia [2005] FCA 536

Daruk Local Aboriginal Land Council v Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act (1993) 30 NSWLR 140

Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472

Engineers’ Case [1920] HCA 54; 28 CLR 129

Fejo v Northern Territory [1998] HCA 58; 195 CLR 96

Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; 214 CLR 118

Ghosh v NineMSN Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 334; 90 NSWLR 595

Griffiths v Northern Territory [2006] FCA 903; 165 FCR 300

Griffiths v Northern Territory [2007] FCAFC 178; 165 FCR 391

Gumana v Northern Territory of Australia [2005] FCA 50; 141 FCR 457

Hayes v Northern Territory [1999] FCA 1248; 97 FCR 32

Hayes on behalf of the Thalanyji People v State of Western Australia [2008] FCA 1487

Henwood v Northern Territory of Australia [2017] FCAFC 182

Jeffery & Katauskas Pty Limited v SST Consulting Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 43; 239 CLR 75

Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] 2 AC 1; 1 All ER 481

Lake Torrens Overlap Proceeding (No 3) [2016] FCA 899

Mabo v Queensland (No 2) [1992] HCA 23; 175 CLR 1

Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria [2002] HCA 58; 214 CLR 422

Minister Administering Crown Lands Act v New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council [2008] HCA 48; 237 CLR 285

Minister Administering the Crown Lands (Consolidation) Act v Tweed Byron Local Aboriginal Land Council (1992) 75 LGRA 133

Moses v Western Australia [2007] FCAFC 78; 160 FCR 148

Munn v State of Queensland [2002] FCA 486

Narrier v State of Western Australia [2016] FCA 1519

Narrier v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2017] FCA 104

Neowarra v Western Australia [2003] FCA 1402

New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council v Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act [2016] HCA 50; 260 CLR 232

North Ganalanja Aboriginal Corporation v Queensland [1996] HCA 2; 185 CLR 595

Northern Territory of Australia v Alyawarr, Kaytetye, Warumungu, Wakaya Native Title Claim Group [2005] FCAFC 135; 145 FCR 442

Northern Territory of Australia v Griffiths [2008] HCATrans 123

Northern Territory v Griffiths [2019] HCA 7; 364 ALR 208

O’Toole v Charles David Pty Ltd [1990] HCA 44; (1991) 171 CLR 232

PNJ v The Queen [2009] HCA 6; 252 ALR 612

Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45; 147 CLR 589

Quall v Northern Territory of Australia [2009] FCA 18

R v Inhabitants of St Nicholas, Rochester (1833) 5 B & Ad 219; 110 ER 773

Ridgeway v The Queen [1995] HCA 66; 184 CLR 19

Risk v Northern Territory of Australia [2006] FCA 404

Rozenblit v Vainer [2018] HCA 23; 262 CLR 478

Rubibi Community v Western Australia (No 6) [2006] FCA 82; 226 ALR 676

Rubibi Community v State of Western Australia (No 7) [2006] FCA 459

Sac and Fox Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v United States 383 F. 2d 991, (1967)

Sandy on behalf of the Yugara People v State of Queensland [2017] FCAFC 108; 254 FCR 107

Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 141; 247 FCR 554

Spalla v St George Motor Finance Ltd (No 6) [2004] FCA 1699

Starkey v South Australia [2018] FCAFC 36; 261 FCR 183

State Bank of New South Wales v Stenhouse (1997) Aust Torts Rep 81-423

State of Victoria v Commonwealth of Australia (the Pay-roll tax Case) [1971] HCA 16; 122 CLR 353

Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing [2015] HCA 28; 256 CLR 507

Tyne v UBS AG (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 5; 250 FCR 341

UBS AG v Tyne [2018] HCA 45; 360 ALR 184

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
21 cases
  • Yunupingu on behalf of the Gumatj Clan or Estate Group v Commonwealth of Australia
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 22 Mayo 2023
    ...34; 163 CLR 303 Fejo v Northern Territory [1998] HCA 58; 195 CLR 96 Fortescue Metals Group v Warrie on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People [2019] FCAFC 177; 273 FCR 350 Foster v Northern Territory of Australia [1999] FCA 1235 Georgiadis v Australian and Overseas Telecommunications Corporation......
  • Malone v State of Queensland (The Clermont-Belyando Area Native Title Claim) (No 5)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 23 Diciembre 2021
    ...69 Evans on behalf of the Yarla-Gu Bunna Nangatjara People v State of Western Australia [2021] FCA 1382 Fortescue Metals Group v Warrie (2019) 273 FCR 350; [2019] FCAFC 177 G v H (1994) 181 CLR 387 Gordon (on behalf of the Kariyarra Native Title Claim Group) v State of Western Australia [20......
  • Houston v State of New South Wales (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 11 Junio 2021
    ...7; 205 CLR 399 Esposito v Commonwealth [2015] FCAFC 160; 235 FCR 1 Fortescue Metals Group v Warrie on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People [2019] FCAFC 177; 273 FCR 350 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) [1964] HCA 69; 112 CLR 125 Georgiadis v Australian and Oversea......
  • Stuart v State of South Australia (Oodnadatta Common Overlap Proceeding) (No 4)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 21 Diciembre 2021
    ...v Northern Territory of Australia [1998] HCA 58; (1998) 195 CLR 96 Fortescue Metals Group v Warrie on behalf of the Yindjbarndi People [2019] FCAFC 177; (2019) 273 FCR 350 Gudjala People #2 v Native Title Registrar [2007] FCA 1167 Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; (1959) 101 CLR 298 King on beha......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • AN ANATOMY OF AUSTRALIA'S LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR BUSHFIRE.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 46 No. 1, December 2022
    • 1 Diciembre 2022
    ...Back Half to the Aboriginal Community', ABC News (online, 21 February 2019) , archived at . (155) Fortescue Metals Group v Warrie (2019) 273 FCR 350, 451 [363] (Jagot and Mortimer JJ), 452-3 [370] (Robertson and Griffiths JJ). See also Richard Bartlett, 'Native Title Rights to Exclusive Pos......