Fountain v Alexander

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation[1982] HCA 16,1982-0423 HCA A
Date1982
Year1982

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
66 cases
  • Huntley Management Ltd v Timbercorp Securities Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Cattanach v Melchior
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 16 July 2003
    ...Barwick CJ, Stephen and Mason JJ concurring. 498 In re B (J A) (An Infant) [1965] Ch 1112 at 1117 per Cross J; Fountain v Alexander (1982) 150 CLR 615 at 635 per Mason 499 R v Gyngall [1893] 2 QB 232 at 252 per Kay LJ. 500 In re O'Hara [1900] 2 IR 232 at 239 per FitzGibbon LJ. 501 In re ......
  • Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v B
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 29 April 2004
    ...R v Lambert; Ex parte Plummer (1980) 146 CLR 447 at 456; Gazzo v Comptroller of Stamps (Vict) (1981) 149 CLR 227 at 234–235, 247–248; Fountain v Alexander (1982) 150 CLR 615 at 632; In the Marriage of Cormick (1984) 156 CLR 170 at 175–176; Re F; Ex parte F (1986) 161 CLR 376 at 382, 389–390......
  • David Harold Eastman v DPP
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 22 August 2014
    ...203 CLR 1 referred to Elias v The Queen (2013) 248 CLR 48 applied Fitzgerald v The Queen [2014] HCA 28 applied Fountain v Alexander (1982) 150 CLR 615 applied Gilham v R [2012] NSWCCA 131 applied Grassby v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 1 applied Griffiths v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 293 referred......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • The Role of the Family Court of Australia in Child Welfare Matters
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 21-1, March 1992
    • 1 March 1992
    ...Mason andMurphy11dissented.16 (1977) 137 CLR 40, 46. See also,egRyLambert;expartePI~r(1980) 146 CLR 447,457 andFOlllllainyAIUIJnder (1982) 150 CLR 615, 627.17 (1980) 146 CLR 447,474.IIIbid4S6.l'Ibid457. There have been some variations in the fonnulationofthe test.Intwo decisions,GibbsCJrefe......
  • Guardianship of Child Asylum-Seekers
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 34-1, March 2006
    • 1 March 2006
    ...135–136; In the Marriage of Newbery (1977) 27 FLR 246, 248; Youngman v Lawson [1981] 1 NSWLR 439, 445–446; Fountain v Alexander (1982) 150 CLR 615, 626–7. 25 Buti, above n 6, [26]; Walder White, 'A Comparison of Some Parental and Guardian Rights' (1980) 3 Canadian Journal of Family Law 219.......