Friend v Brooker

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeFrench CJ,Gummow,Hayne,Bell JJ,Heydon J.
Judgment Date28 May 2009
Neutral Citation[2009] HCA 21,2009-0528 HCA A
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberS475/2008
Date28 May 2009
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
83 cases
  • HIH Claims Support Ltd v Insurance Australia Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 22 Agosto 2011
    ...contribute applies where obligors are under a common burden or common obligation was restated by this Court in the plurality judgment in Friend v Brooker70: "With a claim to contribution, as is the position generally with the intervention of equity to apply its doctrines or to afford its re......
  • SHC Capital Ltd v NTUC Income Insurance Cooperative Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • Invalid date
  • Marlborough District Council v Altimarloch Joint Venture Ltd
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 5 Marzo 2012
    ...the High Court of Australia agreed that a “common design” is not required before an equity for contribution can arise in Friend v Brooker [2009] HCA 21, (2009) 255 ALR 601 at [42] per French CJ, Gummow, Hayne and Bell 244 At [16]. This formulation was accepted by the High Court of Australia......
  • Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Nicholls
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 1 Diciembre 2011
    ...J; [2002] HCA 17; Friend v Brooker (2009) 239 CLR 129 at 148–149 [38]–[43] per French CJ, Gummow, Hayne and Bell JJ (Heydon J agreeing); [2009] HCA 21. 72 [2009] NSWSC 1033 at [284]–[290], 73 [2009] NSWSC 1033 at [582]; [2009] NSWSC 1377 at [49], [64]–[65]. 74 Consul Development Pty Ltd v D......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
1 books & journal articles
  • UNJUST ENRICHMENT IN AUSTRALIA: WHAT IS(N'T) IT? IMPLICATIONS FOR LEGAL REASONING AND PRACTICE.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 43 No. 3, April 2020
    • 1 Abril 2020
    ...J), 56 [199] (Nettle, Gordon and Edelman JJ). (35) Bofinger (n 5). (36) Ibid 299 [88], (37) Ibid 300 [89]. See also Friend v Brooker (2009) 239 CLR 129, 141 [7] (French CJ, Gummow, Hayne and Bell JJ) ('Friend'); Lumbers (n 34) 665 [85] (Gummow, Hayne, Crennan and Kiefel JJ); Hitts (n 7) 618......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT