Fry v Commissioner for Superannuation

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFederal Court
Date1984
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Howitt-Steven v Unisuper Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Phillips v Commissioner for Superannuation
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Meilak v Commissioner for Superannuation
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Wkf v Cch
    • Hong Kong
    • Family Court (Hong Kong)
    • 15 Febrero 2017
    ...and that such amount should be counted as additional to the matrimonial pool of assets. 15. Mostyn J. held in Kremen v Agrest [2012] 2 FCR 472 that: “where the court was satisfied that the disclosure given by one party had been materially deficient, the court was duty bound to consider, by ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT