FTZK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeFrench CJ,Gageler J.,Hayne J.,Crennan,Bell JJ.
Judgment Date27 June 2014
Neutral Citation[2014] HCA 26
Docket NumberM143/2013
Date27 June 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 cases
  • Acting Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v CWY20
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 9 Noviembre 2021
    ...of the decision-maker (see, for example, SZMDS at [36] per Gummow ACJ and Kiefel J; FTZK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] HCA 26; (2014) 88 ALJR 754 at [67] per Crennan and Bell JJ; Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188; (2019) 272 FCR 589 at [34(a)]; Mini......
  • KDSP v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 23 Junio 2020
    ...(1985) 160 CLR 55 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v McNeil (2007) 229 CLR 656 FTZK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] HCA 26; (2014) 88 ALJR 754 Gedeon v Commissioner of the New South Wales Crime Commission (2008) 236 CLR 120 Koon Wing Lau v Calwell (1949) 80 CLR 533 M......
  • ZYVZ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 24 Enero 2020
    ...[1998] HCA 62; (1998) 194 CLR 444 ETA067 v The Republic of Nauru [2018] HCA 46 FTZK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] HCA 26 Hellenic Republic v Tzatzimakis [2003] FCAFC 4; (2003) 127 FCR 130 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; (2018......
  • Knowles v BlueScope Steel Limited
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 12 Marzo 2021
    ...not only being asserted but also that the ground has been made good.94 In FTZK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] HCA 26; 88 ALRJ 752 (FTZK) the High Court gave consideration to the duty of a decision maker required to decide whether there were “serious reasons for cons......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT