Gallagher v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [1986] HCA 26,1986-0522 HCA C |
| Date | 1986 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
116 cases
- Cheney v R
-
OKS v Western Australia
...46–47. 35 Collins v The Queen (2018) 92 ALJR 517 at 526–527 [41]; 355 ALR 203 at 213–214; [2018] HCA 18. See also Gallagher v The Queen (1986) 160 CLR 392 at 412–413; [1986] HCA 26; Wilde v The Queen (1988) 164 CLR 365 at 372; Festa v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 593 at 631 [121], 636 [140], 66......
-
D'orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid
...162 CLR 1. 38 Orr v Holmes (1948) 76 CLR 632 ; Ratten v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 510 at 516–517 per Barwick CJ; Gallagher v The Queen (1986) 160 CLR 392; Mickelberg v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 259. 39 (1986) 162 CLR 1 at 7. 40 As to witnesses, see, for example, Jerom and Knight'sCase (1588) ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...116 Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923) ............................................... 33–34, 48 Gallagher v. he Queen, [1986] HCA 26 .......................................................... 137, 156, 157 General Medical Council v. Meadow (2006), [2006] EWCA Civ 1390, [20......
-
Does Australia Need a Specific Institution to Correct Wrongful Convictions?
...— generally a requirement before the appeal courtswill hear the evidence (Ratten v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 510; Gallagher v R (1986)160 CLR 392).The remaining appellate review court, the High Court, has determined that byvirtue of Australia’s Constitution, it is jurisdictionally unable to ......